- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 12:17:53 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 2012-05-17, at 23:34, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 5/17/12 4:21 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> So, what should an app developer do, if they want their code to be >> portable between different sparql engines? >> >> (answer: they should avoid using empty named graphs. right?) >> >> -- Sandro > circa 2012. There are lots of developers, end-users, power-users already working across SPARQL endpoints without issue. Of all the problems there might be, empty named graphs just isn't one of them :-) +1 - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO Garlik, a part of Experian 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 11:18:22 UTC