- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:17:48 -0400
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 18:34 -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 5/17/12 4:21 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> > So, what should an app developer do, if they want their code to be
> > portable between different sparql engines?
> >
> > (answer: they should avoid using empty named graphs. right?)
> >
> > -- Sandro
> circa 2012. There are lots of developers, end-users, power-users already
> working across SPARQL endpoints without issue. Of all the problems there
> might be, empty named graphs just isn't one of them :-)
What does that mean? That there are much bigger problems? Of course,
but does that really mean we should cause one more?
-- Sandro
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 00:17:59 UTC