Re: Making progress on graphs

On 2012-05-13, at 15:59, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
… 
> PROPOSAL: The abstract syntax for working with multiple graphs in RDF consists of a default graph and zero or more pairs of IRI and graph. This resolves ISSUE-5 (“no”), ISSUE-22 (“yes”), ISSUE-28 (“no”), ISSUE-29 (“yes”), ISSUE-30 (“they are isomorphic”), ISSUE-33 (“no”).

I am in favour of this.

Ivan, sadly Sandro's document is too complex for me to have digested the implications of it yet (entirely my fault), but I would object to us adopting it on that basis. The concepts and terms it introduces may be analogous to things in common usage, but that's hard to determine quickly.

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO
Garlik, a part of Experian
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ

Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 12:42:38 UTC