On May 29, 2012, at 7:02 PM, Gavin Carothers wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote: >> In case anyone wants to have a last-minute check of the RDF Concepts draft before it goes out for publication: >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/rdf-concepts-WD2/rdf-concepts/index.html > > Oooh, my turn! > > There are sections like > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/rdf-concepts-WD2/rdf-concepts/index.html#section-IRIs > which seem to completely overwhelm their content with notes. Any time > a note immediately follows a note there is likely room for > improvement. Also the text doesn't seem to go a whole subsection > without another note. Doesn't really need to be addressed before a new > WD is published. > > Graph isomorphism seems an odd (poor) choice of the first thing > mentioned in the 3 RDF Graphs section. Should likely come after > defining a blank node or it's not going to make any sense. +1. I should have noticed this myself. Pat ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayesReceived on Wednesday, 30 May 2012 01:40:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:18 UTC