Re: Proposal for getting Turtle to LC and N-Triples to FPWD

On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 11:55 -0700, Gavin Carothers wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name> wrote:
> > Proposal
> > =======
> >
> > Separate N-Triples from Turtle document. Publish Turtle as Last Call,
> > publish N-Triples as FPWD
> 
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html No
> longer contains N-Triples.
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/n-triples.html
> Initial very rough split of N-Triples into it's own document.

Let's move n-triples to its own subdirectory, lest it accidentally get
published with Turtle...

    -- Sandro

> >
> > Rationale
> > ========
> >
> > This is the first publication of N-Triples, there will be a great deal
> > of feedback as it stands the N-Triples section of the Turtle document
> > is not ready for Last Call. The Turtle specification itself is made
> > worse by trying to explain N-Triples at the same time as Turtle.
> > Examples will need to be duplicated, confusion about is the same
> > between Turtle and N-Triples is increased not decreased. It will be
> > easier to create better recommendations with them as two separate
> > documents than the current combined form.
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm perfectly happy to keep editing both documents and get both of
> > them to Last Call as soon as possible.
> >
> > --Gavin
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2012 00:27:08 UTC