- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 23:30:12 +0100
- To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Cc: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 9 May 2012, at 22:29, Guus Schreiber wrote: >> Why do *we* need to define the term for a frozen g-box? Why not leave it to the community? > > Sloppy phrasing on my part. I meant to say: this line of reasoning implies there is a need for at most one type. Ok. > With my chair hat on I prefer not to take a position whether we should predefine it or not. I only note that such the "frozen-box" type arose from our use cases. Right. If third parties can define the term without violating something in our spec text (i.e., a “frozen” g-box doesn't contradict something in our semantics), then I'd argue we should leave it to them. Best, Richard
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 22:30:41 UTC