W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: types of "graphs"

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 23:30:12 +0100
Cc: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <039D5A72-4C43-4CE1-8453-8AF7AF16F0DF@cyganiak.de>
To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
On 9 May 2012, at 22:29, Guus Schreiber wrote:
>> Why do *we* need to define the term for a frozen g-box? Why not leave it to the community?
> Sloppy phrasing on my part. I meant to say: this line of reasoning implies there is a need for at most one type.


> With my chair hat on I prefer not to take a position whether we should predefine it or not. I only note that such the "frozen-box" type  arose from our use cases.

Right. If third parties can define the term without violating something in our spec text (i.e., a “frozen” g-box doesn't contradict something in our semantics), then I'd argue we should leave it to them.

Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 22:30:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:17 UTC