- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 11:50:09 -0400
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4FBFAA31.4000101@openlinksw.com>
On 5/24/12 10:47 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > > There are three communities in mind here: > > 1) Web developers that need to use a form of Linked Data that is not > as extensive as requiring TURTLE, SPARQL, or a Graph store. Do you mean structured data without being particularly interested in Linked Data specifics or subjective peculiarities? > 2) The Linked Data folks who see RDF as too complicated and desire > something simpler. Do you mean Web developers that see RDF/XML as too complex and don't necessarily *sense* or buy into the notion of an RDF data model distinct from a collection of expression syntaxes and data representation formats? There's nothing complex about a triple or quad modulo the kind of syntactic obfuscation demonstrated with aplomb by RDF/XML. > 3) RDF folks that would like a JSON serialization, but don't have > any of the issues with bringing themselves up to speed that > group #1 has currently. This developer profile is the only one that's clear to me, at this time. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Friday, 25 May 2012 15:58:55 UTC