- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 12:09:16 +0100
- To: RDF-WG WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
+1 from me too. Makes N-Triples easier to google, easier to reference, and makes both documents easier to explain/motivate. Best, Richard On 21 May 2012, at 11:16, Steve Harris wrote: > +1 > > Though they're technically similar, I think the motivations, and reasons for their use are quite different. > > - Steve > > On 2012-05-18, at 18:50, Gavin Carothers wrote: > >> Proposal >> ======= >> >> Separate N-Triples from Turtle document. Publish Turtle as Last Call, >> publish N-Triples as FPWD >> >> Rationale >> ======== >> >> This is the first publication of N-Triples, there will be a great deal >> of feedback as it stands the N-Triples section of the Turtle document >> is not ready for Last Call. The Turtle specification itself is made >> worse by trying to explain N-Triples at the same time as Turtle. >> Examples will need to be duplicated, confusion about is the same >> between Turtle and N-Triples is increased not decreased. It will be >> easier to create better recommendations with them as two separate >> documents than the current combined form. >> >> >> >> I'm perfectly happy to keep editing both documents and get both of >> them to Last Call as soon as possible. >> >> --Gavin >> > > -- > Steve Harris, CTO > Garlik, a part of Experian > 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK > +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ > Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 > Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ > >
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 11:10:06 UTC