- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 09:01:50 -0400
- To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
If I can't make the call today, please record votes for me as follows: ISSUE-5 Graph literals http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/5 +1 to no graph literals ISSUE-28 Syntactic nesting of g-texts http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/28 +0.5 to no nesting -1 to any semantic additions to support nesting ISSUE-29 Do we support SPARQL's notion of "default graph"? http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/29 +1 to RDF datasets, even without semantics, provide the necessary machinery ISSUE-30 Relation RDF Datasets with multiple graphs http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/30 +1 to RDF datasets, even without semantics, provide this facility ISSUE-33 Mechanism to refer to sub-graphs and/or individual triples http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/33 +1 to RDF datasets, even without semantics, provide enough here. peter On 05/22/2012 04:30 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > I am at risk for tomorrow. It I do connect, it will be via IRC only. > > peter > > > On 05/22/2012 12:08 PM, Guus Schreiber wrote: >> All, >> >> There is draft agenda containing the left overs from last week: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.05.23 >> >> but I will update this with a few more items later today. >> >> >> Guus >>
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 13:02:32 UTC