- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 07:42:17 -0500
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On May 23, 2012, at 7:19 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > Pat, > > On 23 May 2012, at 02:02, Pat Hayes wrote: >> My votes on proposed resolutoins for issues 5, 29, 30 and 33 are +1, and my vote on the resolution for issue-28 is +1, provided that the WG accepts that this resolution has the consequence that we MUST give a semantics to datasets which ensures that the name of a named graph actually does denote the graph, in the 2004 Semantics sense of "denote". Without this acceptance, I formally vote against this resolution for issue 28. > > Let me propose a different wording for the ISSUE-28 resolution then: > > [[ > PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-28 ("Do we need syntactic nesting of graphs (g-texts) as in N3?"), saying No, we do not -- the use cases presented to the WG can be addressed without, and making syntactic nesting pay off would require additional logic machinery that's beyond this WG's scope. > ]] > > The point being that nesting may be a great enabler for things like N3 rules or your RDF Surfaces proposal, but are not really worth it unless we also get N3's @forall or your negative surfaces, and I think it's clear that this WG cannot do that. So no need to complicate our current job by writing nested graphs into the standard now. OK, I am cool with that wording. +1 vote. Pat > > Richard > > > > >> >> Pat >> >> >> >> >> On May 22, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> There is draft agenda containing the left overs from last week: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.05.23 >>> >>> but I will update this with a few more items later today. >>> >>> >>> Guus >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 >> 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office >> Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax >> FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile >> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 12:43:02 UTC