- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 13:49:28 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 5/6/2012 9:01 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 21:08 -0700, Gavin Carothers wrote: >> The nearness of a Turtle LC and the ongoing >> confusion/conversation/whatever on named graphs is reducing my own >> support for trying to support "named graphs" in Turtle. > > I understand. > > I wonder if there's any way to thread this needle -- not holding back > Turtle, but not closing the door to this thing that I suspect is going > to seem like a no-brainer, looking back in a couple of years. Why isn't doing Turtle and also doing TriG accomplishing this? In a couple of years, if named graphs are ubiquitous, then folks will just use TriG. Is it a concern over media types? Something else? Lee
Received on Sunday, 6 May 2012 17:49:52 UTC