W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: GRAPH keyword in Turtle, PREFIX vs @prefix (was Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations)

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 13:49:28 -0400
Message-ID: <4FA6B9A8.8030901@thefigtrees.net>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
CC: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 5/6/2012 9:01 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 21:08 -0700, Gavin Carothers wrote:
>> The nearness of a Turtle LC and the ongoing
>> confusion/conversation/whatever on named graphs is reducing my own
>> support for trying to support "named graphs" in Turtle.
> I understand.
> I wonder if there's any way to thread this needle -- not holding back
> Turtle, but not closing the door to this thing that I suspect is going
> to seem like a no-brainer, looking back in a couple of years.

Why isn't doing Turtle and also doing TriG accomplishing this? In a 
couple of years, if named graphs are ubiquitous, then folks will just 
use TriG. Is it a concern over media types? Something else?

Received on Sunday, 6 May 2012 17:49:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:17 UTC