Re: Making progress on graphs

On 5/17/12 8:17 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 18:34 -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> On 5/17/12 4:21 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>> So, what should an app developer do, if they want their code to be
>>> portable between different sparql engines?
>>> (answer: they should avoid using empty named graphs.  right?)
>>>       -- Sandro
>> circa 2012. There are lots of developers, end-users, power-users already
>> working across SPARQL endpoints without issue. Of all the problems there
>> might be, empty named graphs just isn't one of them :-)
> What does that mean?   That there are much bigger problems?   Of course,
> but does that really mean we should cause one more?
>       -- Sandro

My response means: people are writing portable SPARQL that's working 
just fine. Nobody is complaining about SPARQL portability across DBMS 
engines and/or stores right now.



Kingsley Idehen 
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web:
Personal Weblog:
Twitter/ handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile:
LinkedIn Profile:

Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 02:01:27 UTC