- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 19:12:16 +0100
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Dave, all, I have updated the RDF Concepts ED according to today's resolution. Please review. http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#section-XMLLiteral RDF Semantics still needs to be updated accordingly (make rdf:XMLLiteral optional and interpret it only under D-Entailment, like any other datatype). I've taken the liberty to create an action (on a randomly chosen RDF Semantics editor): https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/170 No objection to the status change. Best, Richard On 9 May 2012, at 17:45, David Wood wrote: > Hi all, > > Today, we resolved [1]: > [[ > RESOLVED: in RDF 1.1: [a] XMLLiterals are optional; [b] lexical space consists of well-formed XML fragments; [c] the canonical lexical form is http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-exc-c14n/, as defined in RDF 2004; [d] the value space consists of (normalized) DOM trees. > ]] > > Richard's proposal [2], that evolved into this resolution, was meant to close ISSUE-13 [3]. So, I have changed the status of ISSUE-13 to "pending approval" and suggest that the implementation of this resolution be considered editorial in nature. > > Any objections? > > Regards, > Dave > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-05-09#resolution_1 > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012May/0006.html > [3] https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/13 > > >
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 18:12:50 UTC