- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:16:03 +0100
- To: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
- Cc: RDF-WG WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
+1 Though they're technically similar, I think the motivations, and reasons for their use are quite different. - Steve On 2012-05-18, at 18:50, Gavin Carothers wrote: > Proposal > ======= > > Separate N-Triples from Turtle document. Publish Turtle as Last Call, > publish N-Triples as FPWD > > Rationale > ======== > > This is the first publication of N-Triples, there will be a great deal > of feedback as it stands the N-Triples section of the Turtle document > is not ready for Last Call. The Turtle specification itself is made > worse by trying to explain N-Triples at the same time as Turtle. > Examples will need to be duplicated, confusion about is the same > between Turtle and N-Triples is increased not decreased. It will be > easier to create better recommendations with them as two separate > documents than the current combined form. > > > > I'm perfectly happy to keep editing both documents and get both of > them to Last Call as soon as possible. > > --Gavin > -- Steve Harris, CTO Garlik, a part of Experian 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 10:16:33 UTC