Re: Proposal for getting Turtle to LC and N-Triples to FPWD

+1

Though they're technically similar, I think the motivations, and reasons for their use are quite different.

- Steve

On 2012-05-18, at 18:50, Gavin Carothers wrote:

> Proposal
> =======
> 
> Separate N-Triples from Turtle document. Publish Turtle as Last Call,
> publish N-Triples as FPWD
> 
> Rationale
> ========
> 
> This is the first publication of N-Triples, there will be a great deal
> of feedback as it stands the N-Triples section of the Turtle document
> is not ready for Last Call. The Turtle specification itself is made
> worse by trying to explain N-Triples at the same time as Turtle.
> Examples will need to be duplicated, confusion about is the same
> between Turtle and N-Triples is increased not decreased. It will be
> easier to create better recommendations with them as two separate
> documents than the current combined form.
> 
> 
> 
> I'm perfectly happy to keep editing both documents and get both of
> them to Last Call as soon as possible.
> 
> --Gavin
> 

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO
Garlik, a part of Experian
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ

Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 10:16:33 UTC