- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:19:37 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 2012-05-18, at 18:35, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> On modifying N-quads to support empty named graphs, maybe this is the
>> time to make N-quads (or a differently-named simple, line-oriented
>> syntax) be a subset of trig. Maybe each line is one of:
>>
>> <blank line>
>> # comment
>> s p o. - triple in default graph
>> g { s p o }. - triple in named graph
>> g { }. - empty named graph
>
> (for the record as no response seems to be taken as agreement)
>
> I see no point in breaking every existing N-Quads file with a named graph in it.
>
> http://wiki.dbpedia.org/Downloads37
>
> My suggestion was:
>
> _ <http://example/g> .
>
> to extend existing N-Quads practice IF necessary.
>
> [I have always found having the graph id last odd but I understand shy it's that way and the original naming was "s p o c" but readability of NQ is not a primary concern.]
>
> Andy
+1 to what Andy says. Emphasis on the IF.
- Steve
--
Steve Harris, CTO
Garlik, a part of Experian
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 10:20:03 UTC