W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Making progress on graphs

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 21:18:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFfrAFo2_JTRQWx54Ni0q77YpigRZo=DbBAGq0hppFvXse-R3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 13 May 2012 20:15, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 13:36 -0400, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>> The syntax part of Sandro's document appears mostly fine to me.
> Great.
>> However, there is quite a bit more to Sandro's document than there is to
>> Richard's proposal.  I'm not in favour of the semantics and
> As long as an RDF graph has truth conditions, I think a Dataset also has
> to have truth conditions.   Do you agree with that?

Me: no, not necessarily. I can imagine that the structure of a dataset
could have a natural reading as an RDF graph (and hence, truth
conditions). But the general mechanism seems to be more analogous to
to things like .zip files / manifests. There might be reasons to
handle the outer structures as propositional but I don't see that as a

Received on Sunday, 13 May 2012 19:18:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:17 UTC