- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 21:18:14 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 13 May 2012 20:15, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 13:36 -0400, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> The syntax part of Sandro's document appears mostly fine to me. > > Great. > >> However, there is quite a bit more to Sandro's document than there is to >> Richard's proposal. I'm not in favour of the semantics and > > As long as an RDF graph has truth conditions, I think a Dataset also has > to have truth conditions. Do you agree with that? Me: no, not necessarily. I can imagine that the structure of a dataset could have a natural reading as an RDF graph (and hence, truth conditions). But the general mechanism seems to be more analogous to to things like .zip files / manifests. There might be reasons to handle the outer structures as propositional but I don't see that as a requirement. Dan
Received on Sunday, 13 May 2012 19:18:44 UTC