- From: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 17:02:41 -0700
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote: > In case anyone wants to have a last-minute check of the RDF Concepts draft before it goes out for publication: > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/rdf-concepts-WD2/rdf-concepts/index.html Oooh, my turn! There are sections like http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/rdf-concepts-WD2/rdf-concepts/index.html#section-IRIs which seem to completely overwhelm their content with notes. Any time a note immediately follows a note there is likely room for improvement. Also the text doesn't seem to go a whole subsection without another note. Doesn't really need to be addressed before a new WD is published. Graph isomorphism seems an odd (poor) choice of the first thing mentioned in the 3 RDF Graphs section. Should likely come after defining a blank node or it's not going to make any sense. "Every absolute URI and URL is an IRI" ... this is a bold statement which should be true but uh... perhaps I'll just let that one sit there. XML 1.1 many things are said about XML 1.1 ... I don't think any of those statements mater as there are no implementations of XML 1.1 and the number of people likely to care about RDF/XML in XML 1.1 is zero. Now XML 1.0 5th Edition... > > The publication date is still preliminary. > > Best, > Richard > >
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2012 00:04:02 UTC