- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 18:35:36 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
> On modifying N-quads to support empty named graphs, maybe this is the
> time to make N-quads (or a differently-named simple, line-oriented
> syntax) be a subset of trig. Maybe each line is one of:
>
> <blank line>
> # comment
> s p o. - triple in default graph
> g { s p o }. - triple in named graph
> g { }. - empty named graph
(for the record as no response seems to be taken as agreement)
I see no point in breaking every existing N-Quads file with a named
graph in it.
http://wiki.dbpedia.org/Downloads37
My suggestion was:
_ <http://example/g> .
to extend existing N-Quads practice IF necessary.
[I have always found having the graph id last odd but I understand shy
it's that way and the original naming was "s p o c" but readability of
NQ is not a primary concern.]
Andy
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 17:36:07 UTC