- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 13:15:32 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Hi Sandro, On 30 May 2012, at 12:17, Sandro Hawke wrote: > It's with these glasses that I think a turtle document can/should just > be an instance of our multiple-graph syntax which doesn't happen to have > any named graphs. I've heard you say two mutually incompatible things: 1. A Turtle file published at <i> containing graph G is an RDF dataset with only named graph <i,G> 2. A Turtle file published at <i> containing graph G is an RDF dataset with only a default graph Which one is it? It can't be both. Best, Richard
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2012 12:16:05 UTC