- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 18:34:46 -0400
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2012 22:35:13 UTC
On 5/17/12 4:21 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > So, what should an app developer do, if they want their code to be > portable between different sparql engines? > > (answer: they should avoid using empty named graphs. right?) > > -- Sandro circa 2012. There are lots of developers, end-users, power-users already working across SPARQL endpoints without issue. Of all the problems there might be, empty named graphs just isn't one of them :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2012 22:35:13 UTC