W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Making progress on graphs

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 18:34:46 -0400
Message-ID: <4FB57D06.5090706@openlinksw.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 5/17/12 4:21 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> So, what should an app developer do, if they want their code to be
> portable between different sparql engines?
> (answer: they should avoid using empty named graphs.  right?)
>      -- Sandro
circa 2012. There are lots of developers, end-users, power-users already 
working across SPARQL endpoints without issue. Of all the problems there 
might be, empty named graphs just isn't one of them :-)



Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Thursday, 17 May 2012 22:35:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:17 UTC