RDF-ISSUE-87 (Revisit 2004 types): Revisit RDF 2004 datatypes that have proven troublesome in OWL and RIF from RDF Working Group Issue Tracker on 2012-05-02 (public-rdf-wg@w3.org from May 2012)

From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 15:29:36 +0000
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1SPbUm-0008CA-MA@tibor.w3.org>

RDF-ISSUE-87 (Revisit 2004 types): Revisit RDF 2004 datatypes that have proven troublesome in OWL and RIF

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/87

Raised by: Richard Cyganiak
On product: 

Some RDF datatypes included in RDF 2004, such as xsd:gYear, have proven troublesome in RIF and OWL due to not being well-behaved w.r.t. ordering.

Revisit them to decide if anything is to be done about it.

Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 15:29:47 UTC