- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 20:02:58 -0500
- To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I am at risk for tomorrow. My votes on proposed resolutoins for issues 5, 29, 30 and 33 are +1, and my vote on the resolution for issue-28 is +1, provided that the WG accepts that this resolution has the consequence that we MUST give a semantics to datasets which ensures that the name of a named graph actually does denote the graph, in the 2004 Semantics sense of "denote". Without this acceptance, I formally vote against this resolution for issue 28. Pat On May 22, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote: > All, > > There is draft agenda containing the left overs from last week: > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.05.23 > > but I will update this with a few more items later today. > > > Guus > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 01:03:57 UTC