- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 16:40:46 +0200
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On May 8, 2012, at 16:35 , David Wood wrote: > On May 8, 2012, at 10:06, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > >> Dear WG, >> >> The Turtle ED doesn't say anything about Unicode normalization. Should it? >> >> RDF Concepts says that the lexical forms of literals SHOULD be in Unicode Normal Form C (NFC). And in the XML-based syntaxes, XML itself explains Unicode normalization issues (at least XML 1.1 does). So I'd expect Turtle to also say something about it. > > Consistency of issues across serializations makes sense. > > Unfortunately, I don't see anything related to Unicode in RDFa 1.0 or 1.1 [1, 2]. Perhaps the intent for RDFa is to defer that to the HTML container. yes. Ivan > > Regards, > Dave > > [1] RDFa in XHTML: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/ > [2] RDFa Core 1.1: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-core/ > > >> >> (But I don't know enough about the issue to have any clue what it should say.) >> >> Best, >> Richard > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 14:38:00 UTC