Re: Sandro's Formal Objection

>> I don't think we need to have this discussion yet. Formal objecttions
>> are post factum. And I'm confident we will be able to resolve this
>> (don't quote me on this in the future).
> Right.  I was just saying "yes, this is an issue about which I'm willing
> to lie in the road".   That doesn't involve any W3C process until/unless
> we are unable to come to any better resolution, and I end up getting run
> over (so to speak).    Given my great faith in many of you, including
> Richard (relevant to this case), I'm quite sure when we actually
> understand each other on this, the disagreement will dissipate.

Just what I was hoping to hear :)



Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 13:52:17 UTC