public-prov-wg@w3.org from April 2013 by author

Christine Runnegar

• Re: Primer staged ready for review (Wednesday, 3 April)

creed@opengeospatial.org

• Re: congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation (Tuesday, 30 April)

Curt Tilmes

• Re: prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Final PROV-XML Staging (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-661: schema appendix of PROV-XML Note [XML Serialization] (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: PROV-XML staged, ready for review (Thursday, 4 April)
• RE: PROV-XML staged, ready for review (Thursday, 4 April)
• Re: reviews (Wednesday, 3 April)

Daniel Garijo

• Re: congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: provenance of prov documents (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: provenance of prov documents (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: content of /ns (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: namespace directory (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: prov-dictionary title: biblio incorrect for all documents (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: Final PROV-XML Staging (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: Final PROV-XML Staging (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: dc review (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: dc review (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: dc review (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: dc review (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: dc review (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: dc review (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Review of prov-dc (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Late review of the PROV-DC mapping document (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Review of prov-dc (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Review of prov-dc (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: PROV-Overview review (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Review of prov-dc (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Dagstuhl acknowledgement (Tuesday, 16 April)
• PROV-Overview review (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: PROV-DC: dct:isVersionOf usage (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: PROV-DC: dct:isVersionOf usage (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Late review of the PROV-DC mapping document (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: Comments on "Dublin Core to PROV Mapping" - part 1 of 2 (Sunday, 14 April)
• Fwd: Comments on "Dublin Core to PROV Mapping" - part 1 of 2 (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: Primer staged ready for review (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: Prov-DC ready for review (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: Prov-DC ready for review (Wednesday, 3 April)
• Re: Primer staged ready for review (Monday, 1 April)

Graham Klyne

• Re: provenance wg meeting minutes 2013-04-25 (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda April 18, 2012 (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: [PROV-AQ] Editors' working copy updated (final pass?) (Friday, 12 April)
• mentionOf representation in RDF (was: prov-links ready for review) (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: Review Prov-AQ (Monday, 8 April)
• Re: Review of PROV-AQ (Friday, 5 April)
• Re: [PROV-AQ] Editors' working copy updated (Friday, 5 April)
• PROV-AQ working copy updated (Friday, 5 April)

Hua, Hook (398C)

• Re: {Disarmed} Re: PROV-XML staged, ready for review (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? (Thursday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? (Thursday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? (Wednesday, 3 April)

Huynh T.D.

• Typos in PROV-N (Monday, 15 April)
• prov-implementations staged (Thursday, 4 April)

Ivan Herman

• Re: updated prov-o provenance (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: updated prov-o provenance (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: updated prov-o provenance (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: prov-family is ready (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: updates of prov namespace (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Check list for the homestretch... (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: updates of prov namespace (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: updates of prov namespace (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: updates of prov namespace (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: updates of prov namespace (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: updates of prov namespace (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: where are we with the changes to documents regarding schemas/ontologies? (Saturday, 27 April)
• Re: content of /ns (Saturday, 27 April)
• Re: [IANA #666222] Request for MIME media type Application/Standards Tree - provenance+xml (Saturday, 27 April)
• Re: content of /ns (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: Change in repository location of 'staged' PROV-XML schemas (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: content of /ns (Friday, 26 April)
• content of /ns (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: where are we with the changes to documents regarding schemas/ontologies? (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: update of prov-aq.ttl in namespace (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: Change in repository location of 'staged' PROV-XML schemas (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: prov-xml mime type (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Check list for the homestretch... (Saturday, 20 April)
• Check list for the homestretch... (Saturday, 20 April)
• Rec approval (Saturday, 20 April)
• Re: link to ED's draft in final documents? (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: provenance working 2013.04.11 teleconference agenda (Wednesday, 10 April)

James Cheney

• Re: prov-dictionary title: biblio incorrect for all documents (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: Revised PROV Overview (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-660 (TomDN): Constraints of PROV-Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: re-staged PROV-SEM (Monday, 15 April)
• re-staged PROV-SEM (Friday, 12 April)
• Dagstuhl acknowledgement (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: prov-constraints is staged (Friday, 12 April)
• PROV-SEM acknowledgements/contributors (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Revised PROV Overview (Thursday, 11 April)
• typo in boilerplate (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-635 (prov-sem-completeness): Completeness and scope of prov-sem [Formal Semantics] (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-579 (declarative-fol-specification): Suggestion to replace procedural specification with (equivalent, but shorter and less prescriptive) declarative theory in First-Order Logic [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review (Thursday, 11 April)
• PROV-SEM staged, ready for review (Friday, 5 April)

Jim McCusker

• Re: congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation (Tuesday, 30 April)

Khalid Belhajjame

• Re: congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: Rec approval (Saturday, 20 April)
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda April 18, 2012 (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Typos in PROV-N (Sunday, 14 April)
• Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Primer staged ready for review (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: prov-links ready for review (Tuesday, 2 April)
• Re: Primer staged ready for review (Tuesday, 2 April)
• Re: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592) (Monday, 1 April)
• Re: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592) (Monday, 1 April)
• Re: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592) (Monday, 1 April)
• Re: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592) (Monday, 1 April)
• Re: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592) (Monday, 1 April)

Luc Moreau

• congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: updated prov-o provenance (Tuesday, 30 April)
• provenance working teleconference 2013-05-02 (Tuesday, 30 April)
• provenance wg meeting minutes 2013-04-25 (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: prov-family serializations (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: prov-family serializations (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: where are we with the changes to documents regarding schemas/ontologies? (Saturday, 27 April)
• Re: [IANA #666222] Request for MIME media type Application/Standards Tree - provenance+xml (Saturday, 27 April)
• Fwd: [IANA #666222] Request for MIME media type Application/Standards Tree - provenance+xml (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: provenance of prov documents (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: content of /ns (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: where are we with the changes to documents regarding schemas/ontologies? (Friday, 26 April)
• where are we with the changes to documents regarding schemas/ontologies? (Friday, 26 April)
• prov-family serializations (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: Provenance of PROV documents (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: prov-xml mime type (Thursday, 25 April)
• prov-xml mime type (Wednesday, 24 April)
• provenance working group teleconference 2013-04-25 (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: prov-dictionary title: biblio incorrect for all documents (Tuesday, 23 April)
• prov-dictionary title: biblio incorrect for all documents (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: Typos in PROV-N (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: re-staged PROV-SEM (Saturday, 13 April)
• link to ED's draft in final documents? (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: prov-constraints is staged (Friday, 12 April)
• today's call: scribe is needed, please (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: provenance working 2013.04.11 teleconference agenda (Wednesday, 10 April)
• provenance of prov documents (Tuesday, 9 April)
• provenance working 2013.04.11 teleconference agenda (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: [PROV-AQ] Editors' working copy updated (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: mentionOf representation in RDF (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: PROV-XML staged, ready for review (Tuesday, 9 April)
• prov-constraints is staged (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: PROV-DM document (Tuesday, 9 April)
• prov-n is staged (Monday, 8 April)
• Re: prov-links ready for review (Monday, 8 April)
• Re: prov-links ready for review (Monday, 8 April)
• Re: prov-links ready for review (Monday, 8 April)
• Re: prov-links ready for review (Monday, 8 April)
• Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review (Monday, 8 April)
• {Disarmed} Re: PROV-XML staged, ready for review (Monday, 8 April)
• Re: Typo in bibliography (for all documents) (Wednesday, 3 April)
• Re: [PROV-AQ] Editors' working copy updated (Wednesday, 3 April)
• Re: Internal Review Prov Dictionary (Wednesday, 3 April)
• Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? (Tuesday, 2 April)

Miles, Simon

• RE: prov-dictionary title: biblio incorrect for all documents (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Provenance of PROV documents (Wednesday, 17 April)
• RE: link to ED's draft in final documents? (Tuesday, 16 April)
• RE: typo in boilerplate (Sunday, 14 April)
• PROV-DM check (Saturday, 13 April)
• PROV-DM check part 1 (Friday, 12 April)
• RE: today's call: scribe is needed, please (Thursday, 11 April)
• RE: Internal Review Prov Dictionary (Wednesday, 10 April)
• Finalised primer staged (Tuesday, 9 April)
• RE: Primer staged ready for review (Tuesday, 9 April)
• RE: Primer staged ready for review (Tuesday, 9 April)
• RE: Primer staged ready for review (Tuesday, 9 April)
• RE: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review (Tuesday, 9 April)
• RE: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592) (Friday, 5 April)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-654 (primer-ducharme): Various clarifications and comments (Bob DuCharme) [Primer] (Tuesday, 2 April)
• Typo in bibliography (for all documents) (Tuesday, 2 April)
• RE: Internal Review Prov Dictionary (Tuesday, 2 April)
• RE: prov-links ready for review (Monday, 1 April)
• RE: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592) (Monday, 1 April)
• RE: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592) (Monday, 1 April)
• RE: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592) (Monday, 1 April)
• RE: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592) (Monday, 1 April)
• RE: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592) (Monday, 1 April)

Paolo Missier

• Re: congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: Typos in PROV-N (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: PROV-DM check (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Typos in PROV-N (Wednesday, 17 April)

Paul Groth

• Re: congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: updated prov-o provenance (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: updates of prov namespace (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: updates of prov namespace (Monday, 29 April)
• updates of prov namespace (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: For group review: the "namespace concatenation" (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: For group review: the "namespace concatenation" (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: prov-aq - not RDF/XML (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: content of /ns (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: where are we with the changes to documents regarding schemas/ontologies? (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: namespace directory (Thursday, 25 April)
• namespace directory (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Provenance of PROV documents (Thursday, 25 April)
• prov-wg Telcon Minutes of the April 18, 2013 (Thursday, 25 April)
• update of prov-aq.ttl in namespace (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: prov-dictionary title: biblio incorrect for all documents (Tuesday, 23 April)
• prov-overview & prov-aq staged (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-296 (TLebo): prov:Location rdfs:subClassOf wgs:SpatialThing ? [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda April 18, 2012 (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Revised PROV Overview (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: PROV-Overview review (Wednesday, 17 April)
• updated prov-overview for vote tomorrow (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: PROV-DC: dct:isVersionOf usage (Tuesday, 16 April)
• prov-wg Telcon Agenda April 18, 2012 (Tuesday, 16 April)
• prov-wg April 11, 2013 Telcon Minutes (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: link to ED's draft in final documents? (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: Revised PROV Overview (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-661: schema appendix of PROV-XML Note [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 11 April)
• comments on prov-xml (Thursday, 11 April)
• Revised PROV Overview (Wednesday, 10 April)
• Re: Primer staged ready for review (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: Prov-DC ready for review (Tuesday, 9 April)
• prov-wg Telcon Minutes April 4, 2013 (Monday, 8 April)
• Re: reviews (Thursday, 4 April)
• Re: Primer staged ready for review (Thursday, 4 April)
• blog post on PROV tutorial at EDBT up (Wednesday, 3 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-654 (primer-ducharme): Various clarifications and comments (Bob DuCharme) [Primer] (Wednesday, 3 April)
• Re: Prov-DC ready for review (Wednesday, 3 April)
• Re: Primer staged ready for review (Wednesday, 3 April)
• prov-wg Telcon Agenda April 4, 2013 (Wednesday, 3 April)

Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

• PROV-ISSUE-668 (TomDN): Disambiguated DBPedia URIs to QNames in XML example [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Wednesday, 17 April)
• PROV-ISSUE-667: attribute/element/type usage conventions in note [XML Serialization] (Wednesday, 17 April)
• PROV-ISSUE-666: Valid namespaces for all PROV-XML Examples [XML Serialization] (Wednesday, 17 April)
• PROV-ISSUE-665: PROV Identifier conventions clarification [XML Serialization] (Wednesday, 17 April)
• PROV-ISSUE-664: Use choice instead of sequence in document/bundle constructor (Wednesday, 17 April)
• PROV-ISSUE-663 (Antoine-FB-DC): Antoine Isaac's Feedback on PROV-DC [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Tuesday, 16 April)
• PROV-ISSUE-662 (stian-FB-DC): Stian's Feedback on PROV-DC [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Tuesday, 16 April)
• PROV-ISSUE-661: schema appendix of PROV-XML Note [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 11 April)
• PROV-ISSUE-660 (TomDN): Constraints of PROV-Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 11 April)
• PROV-ISSUE-659 (dc-prov-namespace): Namespace in DC Mapping Note, dereferenceability of URIs [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Tuesday, 9 April)
• PROV-ISSUE-658 (rehgister-html5-link-relation-types): Register link relation types for use with HTML5 [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Friday, 5 April)
• PROV-ISSUE-657 (PG DC review): Review from DC Note- Paul Groth [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Wednesday, 3 April)
• PROV-ISSUE-656 (TB review): Tom Baker's review on PROV-DC [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Monday, 1 April)

Sam Coppens Ugent

• Review Prov-AQ (Friday, 5 April)

Satya Sahoo

• Re: congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review (Thursday, 11 April)

Stephan Zednik

• Re: [IANA #666222] Request for MIME media type Application/Standards Tree - provenance+xml (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: Change in repository location of 'staged' PROV-XML schemas (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: where are we with the changes to documents regarding schemas/ontologies? (Friday, 26 April)
• Change in repository location of 'staged' PROV-XML schemas (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Final PROV-XML Staging (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: Last-minute PROV-XML review/proofread (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Last-minute PROV-XML review/proofread (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-665: PROV Identifier conventions clarification [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-667: attribute/element/type usage conventions in note [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-664: Use choice instead of sequence in document/bundle constructor (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-666: Valid namespaces for all PROV-XML Examples [XML Serialization] (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-666: Valid namespaces for all PROV-XML Examples [XML Serialization] (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: {Disarmed} Re: PROV-XML staged, ready for review (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-667: attribute/element/type usage conventions in note [XML Serialization] (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-664: Use choice instead of sequence in document/bundle constructor (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: comments on prov-xml (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: comments on prov-xml (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-661: schema appendix of PROV-XML Note [XML Serialization] (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-661: schema appendix of PROV-XML Note [XML Serialization] (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: {Disarmed} Re: PROV-XML staged, ready for review (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: PROV-XML staged, ready for review (Thursday, 4 April)
• PROV-XML staged, ready for review (Thursday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? (Thursday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? (Thursday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? (Thursday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? (Wednesday, 3 April)
• Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? (Wednesday, 3 April)
• Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? (Wednesday, 3 April)
• Re: ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? (Tuesday, 2 April)
• ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? (Tuesday, 2 April)

Stian Soiland-Reyes

• Re: prov-family serializations (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: dc review (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: dc review (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Review of prov-dc (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Review of prov-dc (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: PROV-DC: dct:isVersionOf usage (Tuesday, 16 April)
• PROV-DC: dct:isVersionOf usage (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: Review of PROV-AQ (Thursday, 11 April)
• Review of prov-dc (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: prov-n is staged (Monday, 8 April)
• Review of PROV-AQ (Wednesday, 3 April)

Timothy Lebo

• Re: updated prov-o provenance (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: updated prov-o provenance (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: updated prov-o provenance (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: updates of prov namespace (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Check list for the homestretch... (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: updates of prov namespace (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Check list for the homestretch... (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: updates of prov namespace (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: prov-family is ready (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: prov-family serializations (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: updated prov-o provenance (Monday, 29 April)
• updated prov-o provenance (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: updates of prov namespace (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: prov-family serializations (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: For group review: the "namespace concatenation" (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: For group review: the "namespace concatenation" (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: For group review: the "namespace concatenation" (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: content of /ns (Friday, 26 April)
• For group review: the "namespace concatenation" (Friday, 26 April)
• prov-aq - not RDF/XML (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: content of /ns (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: content of /ns (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: content of /ns (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: prov-dictionary title: biblio incorrect for all documents (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: dc review (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: dc review (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: dc review (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: dc review (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: dc review (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: dc review (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: dc review (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-296 (TLebo): prov:Location rdfs:subClassOf wgs:SpatialThing ? [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-232 (TLebo): activity start/end: direct time upgrades to instantaneous events [Ontology] (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology] (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: typo in boilerplate (Thursday, 11 April)

Tom De Nies

• Re: congratulations: PROV is a Recommendation (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: content of /ns (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: where are we with the changes to documents regarding schemas/ontologies? (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: prov-dictionary owl and xsd moved to NS + updates in staged document (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: namespace directory (Thursday, 25 April)
• prov-dictionary owl and xsd moved to NS + updates in staged document (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: provenance of prov documents (Monday, 22 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 22 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-668 (TomDN): Disambiguated DBPedia URIs to QNames in XML example [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 22 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-660 (TomDN): Constraints of PROV-Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 22 April)
• Re: PROV-Dictionary staged for final vote (Thursday, 18 April)
• Last-minute PROV-XML review/proofread (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda April 18, 2012 (Thursday, 18 April)
• PROV-Dictionary staged for final vote (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-660 (TomDN): Constraints of PROV-Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: re-staged PROV-SEM (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: re-staged PROV-SEM (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: typo in boilerplate (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-660 (TomDN): Constraints of PROV-Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 15 April)
• PROV-Dictionary update for telecon 4.11.2013 (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-644 (TomDN): (Editorial) Make sure production rules in grammar are regular text instead of CSS [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-660 (TomDN): Constraints of PROV-Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review (Wednesday, 10 April)
• Re: Internal Review Prov Dictionary (Wednesday, 10 April)
• Re: provenance working 2013.04.11 teleconference agenda (Wednesday, 10 April)
• Re: mentionOf representation in RDF (was: prov-links ready for review) (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: prov-links ready for review (Thursday, 4 April)

Yolanda Gil

• Re: PROV-DM document (Tuesday, 9 April)
• PROV-DM document (Monday, 8 April)
• Re: Primer staged ready for review (Wednesday, 3 April)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 April 2013 17:21:08 UTC