- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:37:39 -0400
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>, Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Apr 19, 2013, at 8:24 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: >> "dct:isFormatOf refers to another pre-existing resource which is the same >> but in another format" is incorrect. >> >> http://dublincore.org/documents/2012/06/14/dcmi-terms/?v=terms#isFormatOf >> says nothing about "pre-existing" > > .. although the "inverse" > http://dublincore.org/documents/2012/06/14/dcmi-terms/?v=terms#terms-hasFormat I see. > does - probably the source of confusion. Absolutely. @ Daniel, could you add a comment about that DC inconsistency in definitions? (that "pre-existing" is mentioned in isFormatOf but not in hasFormat) Thanks, Tim > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team > School of Computer Science > The University of Manchester > >
Received on Friday, 19 April 2013 12:39:41 UTC