Hi Tim In general, I think somewhere along the line we decided that a mappings based approach was better just so we could be absolutely precise about our semantics. cheers Paul On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: > I've closed this issue, after adding: > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/PROV-FAQ#Isn.27t_prov:Location_just_wgs:SpatialThing.3F > > I'm not sure I have a good answer for why we didn't reuse > wgs:SpatialThing. :-/ > Does anyone have any suggestions? > > > "Anything with spatial extent, i.e. size, shape, or position. e.g. people, > places, bowling balls, as well as abstract areas like cubes." > "A location can be an identifiable geographic place (ISO 19112), but it > can also be a non-geographic place such as a directory, row, or column." > > > As a semantic web person, it's hard for me to argue against reusing > existing classes that have so much similarity. > To be honest, it think it was mostly a practical issue, since it caused > more complication for the WG to complete the PROV-O design. > But, I doubt that's something that we want to admit :-) > > Regards, > Tim > > > > > On Mar 5, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker < > sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > > > PROV-ISSUE-296 (TLebo): prov:Location rdfs:subClassOf wgs:SpatialThing ? > [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] > > > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/296 > > > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > > On product: mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o > > > > http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#SpatialThing is > > > > "Anything with spatial extent, i.e. size, shape, or position. > > e.g. people, places, bowling balls, as well as abstract areas like > cubes." > > > > -Tim > > > > > > > > > > > -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor - Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science - The Network Institute VU University AmsterdamReceived on Thursday, 18 April 2013 14:48:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:35 UTC