# Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY]

From: Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:12:42 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+=hbbdFnN6SQp3Vdy-vXY-rqReWRB8jwewjgQEQUyRC23LL8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Paul, all,

In the latest draft of PROV-Dictionary, we've included a real-world example
of a dictionary and its provenance.
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/dictionary/Overview.html#example

Could you share your thoughts on this?
Our only concern right now is that it is a bit long. Would you consider
this a problem?

Regards,
Tom

2013/3/22 Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>

> my apologies, this was for a different issue. Please ignore the previous
> email.
>
>
> 2013/3/22 Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>
>
>> The editors agree with this comment.
>>
>> The proposed resolution is to add the constraint
>> IF hadMember(d, e) and 'Dictionary' \in typeOf(d) THEN
>> hadDictionaryMember(d, e, "k") with k and unknown key
>> to PROV-Dictionary.
>>
>> If any members of the WG have an objection to this, we ask kindly to
>> inform us by replying to this email. If no objections are received before
>> Tuesday March 26th, we will assume this resolution is accepted,
>>
>> - Tom
>>
>>
>> 2013/3/7 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
>>
>>> PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in
>>> the document [PROV-DICTIONARY]
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/642
>>>
>>> Raised by: Tom De Nies
>>> On product: PROV-DICTIONARY
>>>
>>> Originally raised by Paul, who would like to see a small example of the
>>> provenance of a dictionary in the document to illustrate the spec. We
>>> should do this by the final release.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 10:13:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:35 UTC