- From: Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:20:18 +0200
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+=hbbfbSfPTOSrFXP+ZevHNBuXb=rOK12qdchkF_D-CYruU+Q@mail.gmail.com>
True, but that would limit the example to the use of wasDerivedByInsertionFrom, as all the keys of the starting lineup are the same. Technically, I could only show the players that are inserted into the 2012 roster, and remove all the hadDictionaryMember statements for ex:2011_roster. This would still be valid, but less complete. We could always do this in the document, and then refer to the full provenance in an external file. - Tom 2013/4/15 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> > Hi Tom, > > I like the example, but I wonder why you need to list all the players? Why > not just list the starting line-up this would reduce the number of players > you need to list. > > cool stuff, > Paul > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be> wrote: > >> Hi Paul, all, >> >> In the latest draft of PROV-Dictionary, we've included a real-world >> example of a dictionary and its provenance. >> >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/dictionary/Overview.html#example >> >> Could you share your thoughts on this? >> Our only concern right now is that it is a bit long. Would you consider >> this a problem? >> >> Regards, >> Tom >> >> >> 2013/3/22 Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be> >> >>> my apologies, this was for a different issue. Please ignore the previous >>> email. >>> >>> >>> 2013/3/22 Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be> >>> >>>> The editors agree with this comment. >>>> >>>> The proposed resolution is to add the constraint >>>> IF hadMember(d, e) and 'Dictionary' \in typeOf(d) THEN >>>> hadDictionaryMember(d, e, "k") with k and unknown key >>>> to PROV-Dictionary. >>>> >>>> If any members of the WG have an objection to this, we ask kindly to >>>> inform us by replying to this email. If no objections are received before >>>> Tuesday March 26th, we will assume this resolution is accepted, >>>> >>>> - Tom >>>> >>>> >>>> 2013/3/7 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> >>>> >>>>> PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary >>>>> in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY] >>>>> >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/642 >>>>> >>>>> Raised by: Tom De Nies >>>>> On product: PROV-DICTIONARY >>>>> >>>>> Originally raised by Paul, who would like to see a small example of >>>>> the provenance of a dictionary in the document to illustrate the spec. We >>>>> should do this by the final release. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > -- > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ > Assistant Professor > - Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science > - The Network Institute > VU University Amsterdam >
Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 11:20:46 UTC