W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2013

Re: PROV-ISSUE-666: Valid namespaces for all PROV-XML Examples [XML Serialization]

From: Stephan Zednik <zednis2@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:14:59 -0600
Message-Id: <B3700B6C-1314-4FAA-B766-F538C5590304@rpi.edu>
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I have updated the examples in the PROV-XML Note editors draft to all use prefixed identifier values.

https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/31e1e3f0ef59

--Stephan

On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:50 PM, Stephan Zednik <zednis2@rpi.edu> wrote:

> I think both options make sense.  I will update the examples in the Note to ensure have declared namespaces.
> 
> The Primer should be checked to ensure that all PROV-XML examples have defined namespaces in identifiers.
> 
> Luc, do you feel the example documents in eg-40 should also be updated?
> 
> --Stephan
> 
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:14 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
> 
>> PROV-ISSUE-666: Valid namespaces for all PROV-XML Examples [XML Serialization]
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/666
>> 
>> Raised by: Stephan Zednik
>> On product: XML Serialization
>> 
>> 
>> While the examples probably XML-validate, many of them do not
>>   satisfy the convention that "All PROV identifiers are expressed as QNames in prov-xml."
>> 
>>  for instance <agend id="ag/> require, either:
>>   - a default namespace to be defined xmlns=MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "ex.org" claiming to be "http://ex.org", or
>>   - a prefix to be added  <agend id="ex:ag/>
>> 
>>  My preference is for the latter option.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 02:15:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:35 UTC