- From: Stephan Zednik <zednis2@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:14:59 -0600
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I have updated the examples in the PROV-XML Note editors draft to all use prefixed identifier values. https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/31e1e3f0ef59 --Stephan On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:50 PM, Stephan Zednik <zednis2@rpi.edu> wrote: > I think both options make sense. I will update the examples in the Note to ensure have declared namespaces. > > The Primer should be checked to ensure that all PROV-XML examples have defined namespaces in identifiers. > > Luc, do you feel the example documents in eg-40 should also be updated? > > --Stephan > > On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:14 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > >> PROV-ISSUE-666: Valid namespaces for all PROV-XML Examples [XML Serialization] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/666 >> >> Raised by: Stephan Zednik >> On product: XML Serialization >> >> >> While the examples probably XML-validate, many of them do not >> satisfy the convention that "All PROV identifiers are expressed as QNames in prov-xml." >> >> for instance <agend id="ag/> require, either: >> - a default namespace to be defined xmlns=MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "ex.org" claiming to be "http://ex.org", or >> - a prefix to be added <agend id="ex:ag/> >> >> My preference is for the latter option. >> >> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 02:15:24 UTC