Re: PROV-Overview review

Thanks!


2013/4/17 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for these. All your changes have been included.
>
> Thanks
> Paul
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Daniel Garijo <
> dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> wrote:
>
>>  Hi Paul, Luc.
>>  Below is my review of PROV Overview.
>> In general it's just a couple of editorial changes and a few typos.
>> Nice work!
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
>>
>> Document reviewed (latest working draft):
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/overview/prov-overview.html
>> On 04-16-2013.
>>
>> PROV family of Documents
>>     Dublic Core -> Dublin Core.
>>     bundles . [PROV-LINKS] -> bundles. [PROV-LINKS]
>>
>> Introduction
>>     I think the figure should have a title. Something like: Figure 1:
>> organization of PROV.
>>
>>     The different modules could be mentioned when explaining the figure.
>> That would make it easier to follow.
>>     Suggestion:
>>     "Below is the organization of PROV. At its core is a conceptual data
>> model, which defines a common vocabulary
>>     used to describe provenance. This is instantiated by various
>> serializations. These serializations are used by
>>     implementations to interchange provenance. To help developers and
>> users express valid provenance, a set of
>>     constraints are defined, which can be used to implement provenance
>> validators. Finally, to further support the
>>     interchange of provenance, additional specifications are provided for
>> protocols to locate and access provenance,
>>     connect sets of provenance descriptions, and define how to
>> interoperate with the widely used Dublin Core vocabulary."
>>     -->
>>     "Below is the organization of PROV. At its core is a conceptual data
>> model (PROV-DM), which defines a common vocabulary
>>     used to describe provenance. This is instantiated by various
>> serializations (PROV-O, PROV-N, PROV-XML, etc). These serializations are
>> used by
>>     implementations to interchange provenance. To help developers and
>> users express valid provenance, a set of
>>     constraints are defined (PROV-CONSTRAINTS), which can be used to
>> implement provenance validators. Finally, to further support the
>>     interchange of provenance, additional specifications are provided for
>> protocols to locate and access provenance (PROV-AQ),
>>     connect sets of provenance descriptions (PROV-LINKS), and define how
>> to interoperate with the widely used Dublin Core vocabulary (PROV-DC)."
>>
>>     Note that no reference to prov-dictionary or prov sem can be found in
>> the description.
>>
>> Document Roadmap
>>     Typo in Table, row 11: "...across bundles of provenance description."
>> --> "across bundles of provenance descriptions."
>>
>> Namespace
>>     "...within the namespace http://www.http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#" ->
>> namespace should be http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
>>
>> Additional information
>>     All links point to the release of April 30 except for the PROV
>> implementation report:
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-prov-implementations-20130312/
>>
>> Acknowledgements: Could you please change my institution to Daniel Garijo
>> (Ontology Engineering Group, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid)?
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
> Assistant Professor
> - Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science
> - The Network Institute
> VU University Amsterdam
>