W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2013

Re: provenance of prov documents

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:26:40 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|4e6b011e17bbd1c8325cb1a61897c3d9p3PDQh08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|517A7280.2040302@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Daniel,

I haven't used revision, but simply derivation, for the whole prov-family.
Are you suggesting to change this in most places?

I don't think (as indicated many times) that we should use 
wasInfluencedBy in that way.
It goes against what we recommend in our specs.

Luc

On 04/26/2013 01:12 PM, Daniel Garijo wrote:
> Hi Luc,
> I have checked the assertions about prov dc.
> You have covered almost all the ones I had in the .ttl file for the 
> latest release of the note,
> so I'll be happy with the redirection to the bigger PROV file. Nice work!
>
> Could you please add these 2?
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-dc-20130430/>
>     prov:wasRevisionOf <http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-dc-20130312/>;
>     prov:wasInfluencedBy 
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-dc-20130430/#acknowledgements>.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
>
> 2013/4/22 Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be <mailto:tom.denies@ugent.be>>
>
>     Hi Luc,
>
>     thanks for creating this record, and in the process, creating a
>     nice example of PROV-Dictionary!
>     I've checked the provenance for prov-dictionary, and it looks
>     good. (Easy check with only 2 revisions :) )
>
>     Do we want to extract the separate provenance for each document or
>     keep it in 1 big file? If the latter, which URL will we be using?
>     (So I can include it in the staged Note)
>
>     Regards,
>     Tom
>
>
>
>     2013/4/9 Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>     <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>>
>
>         Editors, all,
>
>         Ahead of Thursday's teleconference, I wanted to invite you to
>         review a file that I produced describing
>         the provenance of our documents. I am proposing to use this as
>         the provenance for prov-dm/n/constraints.
>         Other editors may want to use it for their own document.
>
>         Could you look at the document and check that descriptions are
>         correct. In particular,
>         authorship/revisions/etc need to be checked.
>
>         As an author, you may want to check that you are acknowledged too.
>
>         http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.04.11#Provenance_of_documents
>
>         Obviously, much more can be included (minutes, decisions,
>         etc), but I will let someone else to
>         write it ;-)
>
>         Once we are happy with the file, some hand-crafting of the
>         rdf, and probably xml will be required.
>
>         Cheers,
>         Luc
>
>         PS. I am also making use of prov-dictionary and prov-dc here.
>
>
>         -- 
>         Professor Luc Moreau
>         Electronics and Computer Science   tel: +44 23 8059 4487
>         <tel:%2B44%2023%208059%204487>
>         University of Southampton          fax: +44 23 8059 2865
>         <tel:%2B44%2023%208059%202865>
>         Southampton SO17 1BJ               email:
>         l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
>         United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>         <http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/%7Elavm>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 12:27:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:35 UTC