comments on prov-xml

Hi Stephan, prov-xml editors

I'm happy for prov-xml to be released as a final note. It's a
straightforward and clear presentation.

My Comments:


#Section 1

* "This specification goal" --> "This specification's goal"
* italize - "This specification goal is to provide a succinct definition of
the XML form of PROV-DM"

# Section 1.1

* add prefix prov: as a convention
* what is OXM?

# Section 2.3

* A sudden mention of PROV-N. Can we get a simple two sentence intro to
PROV-N.
* Maybe lead with the general xml pattern that is followed and then justify
by analogy to PROV-N
* "Stating all type information using the PROV type attribute assists in
interoperability with non-PROV-XML encoding of PROV." - Why?


# Section 3

* I like table 1
* Why no link back to dm definitions?
* What's the provenance of the examples? just out of curiosity

# Appendix

* do we want the schemas here? we don't do this with the ontology



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
- Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science
- The Network Institute
VU University Amsterdam