- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:37:37 -0400
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <3CE0A2A6-061B-460F-9556-DE143F4459CA@rpi.edu>
Ivan,
On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:17 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 16:42 , Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
>
>> Ivan (and Paul),
>>
>> 1)
>>
>> I put together a script [1] to check the ns:
>>
>> prov/namespace$ bin/test-w3org.sh
>> FAIL: text/turtle from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov does not match releases/prov-20130430/prov.ttl
>> FAIL: application/rdf+xml from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov does not match releases/prov-20130430/prov.owl
>> pass: application/xml from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov matches prov.xsd
>
> Can you check again? I pulled prov.owl and prov.ttl again from mercurial's namespace folder and pushed it up to the server.
curl -sH "Accept: text/turtle" -L http://www.w3.org/ns/prov
is returning the "minimal template" https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/namespace/prov.ttl
when it should be returning the "full concatenation" https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/namespace/releases/prov-20130430/prov.ttl
Sorry for the confusion. The WG agreed to "materialize" the owl:imports so ease access, and I probably chose a bad location for the "minimal template".
>
>>
>> pass: text/turtle from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o matches prov-o.ttl
>> FAIL: application/rdf+xml from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o does not match prov-o.owl
>
> I am not sure what happens here. I have pulled, again, the prov-o.owl from mercurial,
To be explicit, you mean https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/namespace/prov-o.owl ?
> and cvs-d it to the server; but cvs does not even do anything, it feels things are fine and there has been no change. Are you sure that the mercurial content is o.k.?
>
I'm disagree. From what I see, it is not up to date…
curl -sH 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o | grep versionIRI
<owl:versionIRI rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-o-20121111/prov.owl"/>
^^ that version is very much out of date.
curl -sH 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/namespace/prov-o.owl | grep versionIRI
<owl:versionIRI rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20130430"/>
^^ this is what it should be.
Do you get the same from these commands?
Thanks,
Tim
> Ivan
>
>
>>
>> pass: text/turtle from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-inverses matches prov-o-inverses.ttl
>> pass: application/rdf+xml from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-inverses matches prov-o-inverses.owl
>>
>> pass: text/turtle from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-links matches prov-links.ttl
>> pass: application/rdf+xml from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-links matches prov-links.owl
>> pass: application/xml from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-links matches prov-links.xsd
>>
>>
>> 2)
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov seems to return ONLY prov-o's OWL.
>>
>> After Paul confirms and the WG approves, I _think_ it should return the full concatenation at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/namespace/releases/prov-20130430
>>
>>
>> 3)
>>
>> Diffing the rdf/xml from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o, I agree with the script -- it is out of date (by the updated rdfs:label and the revision URIs)
>>
>> < <owl:Ontology rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o#">
>> < <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">W3C PROVenance Interchange Ontology (PROV-O)</rdfs:label>
>> < <owl:versionInfo xml:lang="en">Recommendation version 2013-04-30</owl:versionInfo>
>> ---
>>> <owl:Ontology rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#">
>>> <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">PROV-O</rdfs:label>
>> 23a23,25
>>> <wasRevisionOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-o-20120724/prov.owl"/>
>>> <owl:versionIRI rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-o-20121111/prov.owl"/>
>>> <rdfs:seeAlso rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/prov#"/>
>> 25,28d26
>> < <rdfs:seeAlso rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov"/>
>> < <specializationOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o"/>
>> < <wasRevisionOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20120312"/>
>> < <owl:versionIRI rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20130430"/>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/9328abfce732/namespace/bin/test-w3org.sh
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 29, 2013, at 9:38 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Done. Check it...
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>> On Apr 29, 2013, at 15:14 , Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Paul, Ivan,
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 29, 2013, at 2:49 AM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ivan, Tim
>>>>>
>>>>> @Ivan: Can you update the namespace with overview.html in the /namespace directory?
>>>>>
>>>>> @Ivan: when I content negotiation for text/provenance-notation - should we get something back?
>>>>>
>>>>> @Tim looking at the concatenated version you point to mercurial urls for the dm and n (e.g. http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Association) . Can we point to the correct dated urls? I think this is coming from prov-o?
>>>>
>>>> I updated the links in prov-o to the REC URLs, and reran the prov namespace concatenation to reflect the prov-o updates:
>>>>
>>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/3a2127f3da8b
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I also changed the "The following was imported" from the mercurial URL to the w3.org/ns URL, e.g.:
>>>>
>>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/5536b4712832#l4.7
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> @Ivan, the following need to be pushed to w3.org/ns:
>>>>
>>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/namespace/prov-o*
>>>>
>>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/namespace/releases/prov-20130430/*
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>>> mobile: +31-641044153
>>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 15:38:10 UTC