- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:37:37 -0400
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <3CE0A2A6-061B-460F-9556-DE143F4459CA@rpi.edu>
Ivan, On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:17 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > On Apr 29, 2013, at 16:42 , Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: > >> Ivan (and Paul), >> >> 1) >> >> I put together a script [1] to check the ns: >> >> prov/namespace$ bin/test-w3org.sh >> FAIL: text/turtle from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov does not match releases/prov-20130430/prov.ttl >> FAIL: application/rdf+xml from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov does not match releases/prov-20130430/prov.owl >> pass: application/xml from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov matches prov.xsd > > Can you check again? I pulled prov.owl and prov.ttl again from mercurial's namespace folder and pushed it up to the server. curl -sH "Accept: text/turtle" -L http://www.w3.org/ns/prov is returning the "minimal template" https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/namespace/prov.ttl when it should be returning the "full concatenation" https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/namespace/releases/prov-20130430/prov.ttl Sorry for the confusion. The WG agreed to "materialize" the owl:imports so ease access, and I probably chose a bad location for the "minimal template". > >> >> pass: text/turtle from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o matches prov-o.ttl >> FAIL: application/rdf+xml from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o does not match prov-o.owl > > I am not sure what happens here. I have pulled, again, the prov-o.owl from mercurial, To be explicit, you mean https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/namespace/prov-o.owl ? > and cvs-d it to the server; but cvs does not even do anything, it feels things are fine and there has been no change. Are you sure that the mercurial content is o.k.? > I'm disagree. From what I see, it is not up to date… curl -sH 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o | grep versionIRI <owl:versionIRI rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-o-20121111/prov.owl"/> ^^ that version is very much out of date. curl -sH 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/namespace/prov-o.owl | grep versionIRI <owl:versionIRI rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20130430"/> ^^ this is what it should be. Do you get the same from these commands? Thanks, Tim > Ivan > > >> >> pass: text/turtle from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-inverses matches prov-o-inverses.ttl >> pass: application/rdf+xml from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-inverses matches prov-o-inverses.owl >> >> pass: text/turtle from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-links matches prov-links.ttl >> pass: application/rdf+xml from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-links matches prov-links.owl >> pass: application/xml from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-links matches prov-links.xsd >> >> >> 2) >> >> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov seems to return ONLY prov-o's OWL. >> >> After Paul confirms and the WG approves, I _think_ it should return the full concatenation at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/namespace/releases/prov-20130430 >> >> >> 3) >> >> Diffing the rdf/xml from http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o, I agree with the script -- it is out of date (by the updated rdfs:label and the revision URIs) >> >> < <owl:Ontology rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o#"> >> < <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">W3C PROVenance Interchange Ontology (PROV-O)</rdfs:label> >> < <owl:versionInfo xml:lang="en">Recommendation version 2013-04-30</owl:versionInfo> >> --- >>> <owl:Ontology rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#"> >>> <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">PROV-O</rdfs:label> >> 23a23,25 >>> <wasRevisionOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-o-20120724/prov.owl"/> >>> <owl:versionIRI rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-o-20121111/prov.owl"/> >>> <rdfs:seeAlso rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/prov#"/> >> 25,28d26 >> < <rdfs:seeAlso rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov"/> >> < <specializationOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o"/> >> < <wasRevisionOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20120312"/> >> < <owl:versionIRI rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20130430"/> >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> Tim >> >> >> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/9328abfce732/namespace/bin/test-w3org.sh >> >> >> >> On Apr 29, 2013, at 9:38 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> Done. Check it... >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Ivan >>> >>> On Apr 29, 2013, at 15:14 , Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: >>> >>>> Paul, Ivan, >>>> >>>> On Apr 29, 2013, at 2:49 AM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Ivan, Tim >>>>> >>>>> @Ivan: Can you update the namespace with overview.html in the /namespace directory? >>>>> >>>>> @Ivan: when I content negotiation for text/provenance-notation - should we get something back? >>>>> >>>>> @Tim looking at the concatenated version you point to mercurial urls for the dm and n (e.g. http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Association) . Can we point to the correct dated urls? I think this is coming from prov-o? >>>> >>>> I updated the links in prov-o to the REC URLs, and reran the prov namespace concatenation to reflect the prov-o updates: >>>> >>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/3a2127f3da8b >>>> >>>> >>>> I also changed the "The following was imported" from the mercurial URL to the w3.org/ns URL, e.g.: >>>> >>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/5536b4712832#l4.7 >>>> >>>> >>>> @Ivan, the following need to be pushed to w3.org/ns: >>>> >>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/namespace/prov-o* >>>> >>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/namespace/releases/prov-20130430/* >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Tim >>>> >>> >>> >>> ---- >>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >>> mobile: +31-641044153 >>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 15:38:10 UTC