Re: Prov-DC ready for review

Hi Daniel,

Looks good. Thanks for that.

Paul


On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Daniel Garijo <
dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> wrote:

>   Hi Paul,
>  I have added your proposed edits. Issue 657 is now pending review.
>  Regarding section 3.2, I have changed it to be:
> "In order to produce complex mappings for the DC terms, we need specific
> subclasses extending the PROV ontology. These subclases are designed to
> qualify the DC properties in the complex mappings. For example, a
> dc:publisher relationship implies a "Publish" activity which used some
> entity to be published, produced a published entity and was associated with
> a publisher. The PROV extensions for Dublin Core can be seen below: "
>
>  And, after the refinements, I've changed the text to be:
> "Additional refinements of the PROV properties have been ommitted, since
> the direct mappings presented in Section 3.1 already define the
> relationship between both vocabularies."
> Best,
> Daniel
>
>
> 2013/4/3 Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
>
>>  Thanks Paul.
>>  I've created an issue and will deal with it as soon as I can.
>>  Best,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> 2013/4/3 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
>>
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>>  Thanks for the update to this document. My review is below. I think
>>> it's a good document.
>>>
>>>  Regards
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>  ==Review of PROV-DC==
>>>  Abstract
>>>
>>>  - "the resource" --> "a resource"
>>> - I don't know what " Translating these terms to PROV makes the
>>> contained provenance information explicit within a provenance chain" means?
>>> - can you replace "provenance chain" with provenance? I don't know what
>>> provenance chain buys as a term
>>>
>>>  Section 1.2
>>> - "interested on" --> "interested in"
>>> - "community discussions" --> "community discussion"
>>> - maybe replace "Some terms may have misleading names …" with "Some
>>> terms may imply a mapping (e.g. …), but do not in fact correspond.
>>>
>>>  Section 2.1
>>> - "DCMI terms hold a lot of " ---> "Many DCMI terms can be used to
>>> describe provenance information about a resource:"
>>>
>>>  Section 2.2
>>> - "Since we cannot ensure that the published resource has not suffered…"
>>> --> …has not gone through…
>>>
>>>  - "it has been chosen as guideline in the complex mapping" --> "it has
>>> been chosen as the approach for the complex mapping defined in this
>>> document."
>>>
>>>  Section 3.1
>>>
>>>  - dct:Creator - "He has the attribution for the outcome of that
>>> activity." --> "They have the attribution…'
>>>
>>>  - dct:contributor - comma after Therefore
>>>
>>>  - dct:isFormatOf - comma after Thus
>>>
>>>  - dot:references - comma after In PROV
>>>
>>>  Section 3.2
>>> - You should say why you introduce these? I think it's for the Complex
>>> Mappings is that correct?
>>> - You say these are properties but they are actually classes in the last
>>> paragraph of the section? why?
>>>
>>>  Section 3.4
>>> - It's not a list of possibilities - you provide two
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Daniel Garijo <
>>> dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Hi all, I have staged the note for review here:
>>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/dc-note/releases/NOTE-prov-dc-20130430/Overview.html
>>>>
>>>>  The main changes since the last WD have been:
>>>>
>>>>    - Added the mapping between has_provenance and dct:provenance (and
>>>>    dct:ProvenanceStatement and prov:Bundle)
>>>>    - Changed dct:references as a type of derivation.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   --
>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
>>> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
>>> Assistant Professor
>>> - Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science
>>> - The Network Institute
>>> VU University Amsterdam
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
- Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science
- The Network Institute
VU University Amsterdam

Received on Tuesday, 9 April 2013 13:42:55 UTC