W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2013

Re: namespace directory

From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:02:17 +0200
Message-ID: <F6482DBC-4193-41F5-B38F-C62AF84D22C0@vu.nl>
CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
To: Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>
Great.  Thanks
Paul

On Apr 25, 2013, at 18:34, Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be> wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think prov-dictionary is the correct short name for us.
> 
> Right now they are at
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/namespace/prov-dictionary.owl
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/namespace/prov-dictionary.ttl
> 
> and the link in the document is:
> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-dictionary
> 
> (Which apparently already exists, but now points to the old Collection OWL)
> 
> Tom
> 
> 2013/4/25 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
>> Hi Editors,
>> 
>> here's the plan:
>> 
>> Please put a .ttl ,  .owl , .xsd file with the description of your terms in the /namespace directory at the top level
>> 
>> We need this for 
>> 
>> - prov-o
>> - prov-aq
>> - prov-links
>> - prov-dict
>> - prov-dc
>> - prov-xml
>> 
>> The urls for each will be at:
>> 
>> - http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o
>> - http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-aq
>> - and so on using the short name
>> 
>> Please let us know when you've finished this
>> 
>> @Tim for the rdf, we can concatenate the various files following the approach you outlined before.
>> 
>> Does this make sense?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Paul
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
>> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
>> Assistant Professor
>> - Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science
>> - The Network Institute
>> VU University Amsterdam
> 

Received on Thursday, 25 April 2013 17:02:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:35 UTC