- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:02:17 +0200
- To: Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <F6482DBC-4193-41F5-B38F-C62AF84D22C0@vu.nl>
Great. Thanks Paul On Apr 25, 2013, at 18:34, Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be> wrote: > > Hi, > > I think prov-dictionary is the correct short name for us. > > Right now they are at > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/namespace/prov-dictionary.owl > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/namespace/prov-dictionary.ttl > > and the link in the document is: > http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-dictionary > > (Which apparently already exists, but now points to the old Collection OWL) > > Tom > > 2013/4/25 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> >> Hi Editors, >> >> here's the plan: >> >> Please put a .ttl , .owl , .xsd file with the description of your terms in the /namespace directory at the top level >> >> We need this for >> >> - prov-o >> - prov-aq >> - prov-links >> - prov-dict >> - prov-dc >> - prov-xml >> >> The urls for each will be at: >> >> - http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o >> - http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-aq >> - and so on using the short name >> >> Please let us know when you've finished this >> >> @Tim for the rdf, we can concatenate the various files following the approach you outlined before. >> >> Does this make sense? >> >> Thanks >> Paul >> >> >> -- >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) >> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ >> Assistant Professor >> - Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science >> - The Network Institute >> VU University Amsterdam >
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2013 17:02:50 UTC