W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2013

Re: Prov-DC ready for review

From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 20:11:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAExK0DfPzofv1puaHyxWa8RBVKLha79ECdsXK1DJg46azoteFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Cc: "<public-prov-wg@w3.org>" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Thanks Paul.
I've created an issue and will deal with it as soon as I can.
Best,
Daniel


2013/4/3 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for the update to this document. My review is below. I think it's a
> good document.
>
> Regards
> Paul
>
> ==Review of PROV-DC==
> Abstract
>
> - "the resource" --> "a resource"
> - I don't know what " Translating these terms to PROV makes the contained
> provenance information explicit within a provenance chain" means?
> - can you replace "provenance chain" with provenance? I don't know what
> provenance chain buys as a term
>
> Section 1.2
> - "interested on" --> "interested in"
> - "community discussions" --> "community discussion"
> - maybe replace "Some terms may have misleading names …" with "Some terms
> may imply a mapping (e.g. …), but do not in fact correspond.
>
> Section 2.1
> - "DCMI terms hold a lot of " ---> "Many DCMI terms can be used to
> describe provenance information about a resource:"
>
> Section 2.2
> - "Since we cannot ensure that the published resource has not suffered…"
> --> …has not gone through…
>
> - "it has been chosen as guideline in the complex mapping" --> "it has
> been chosen as the approach for the complex mapping defined in this
> document."
>
> Section 3.1
>
> - dct:Creator - "He has the attribution for the outcome of that activity."
> --> "They have the attribution…'
>
> - dct:contributor - comma after Therefore
>
> - dct:isFormatOf - comma after Thus
>
> - dot:references - comma after In PROV
>
> Section 3.2
> - You should say why you introduce these? I think it's for the Complex
> Mappings is that correct?
> - You say these are properties but they are actually classes in the last
> paragraph of the section? why?
>
> Section 3.4
> - It's not a list of possibilities - you provide two
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Daniel Garijo <
> dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> wrote:
>
>>  Hi all, I have staged the note for review here:
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/dc-note/releases/NOTE-prov-dc-20130430/Overview.html
>>
>>  The main changes since the last WD have been:
>>
>>    - Added the mapping between has_provenance and dct:provenance (and
>>    dct:ProvenanceStatement and prov:Bundle)
>>    - Changed dct:references as a type of derivation.
>>
>> Best,
>> Daniel
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
> Assistant Professor
> - Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science
> - The Network Institute
> VU University Amsterdam
>
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 18:12:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:35 UTC