- From: Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:54:37 +0200
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+=hbbcXVorEk7U7jNU3_q441-bhCyQO17sF4NFjMjkv+Bd-Dg@mail.gmail.com>
this issue is now closed. 2013/4/15 Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be> > Hi everybody, > > the example has now been added to PROV-Dictionary in all serializations: > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/dictionary/Overview.html#example > > Could someone go over these to check for mistakes? Thanks in advance. > > This issue is now marked pending review. > > > Tom > > 2013/4/15 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> > >> nice one >> >> pg >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be> wrote: >> >>> Done. >>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/dictionary/Overview.html#example >>> >>> We're working on the XML and PROV-O serializations. In those sections, >>> we'll do a similar thing as in the prov-n example to preserve the oversight >>> in the document. >>> >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> 2013/4/15 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> >>> >>>> Hi Tom, >>>> >>>> I think that would be better (you could put ...) in the example and >>>> then refer to the full data file elsewhere >>>> >>>> Paul >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>wrote: >>>> >>>>> True, but that would limit the example to the use of >>>>> wasDerivedByInsertionFrom, as all the keys of the starting lineup are the >>>>> same. >>>>> Technically, I could only show the players that are inserted into the >>>>> 2012 roster, and remove all the hadDictionaryMember statements for >>>>> ex:2011_roster. This would still be valid, but less complete. We could >>>>> always do this in the document, and then refer to the full provenance in an >>>>> external file. >>>>> >>>>> - Tom >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2013/4/15 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Tom, >>>>>> >>>>>> I like the example, but I wonder why you need to list all the >>>>>> players? Why not just list the starting line-up this would reduce the >>>>>> number of players you need to list. >>>>>> >>>>>> cool stuff, >>>>>> Paul >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Paul, all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In the latest draft of PROV-Dictionary, we've included a real-world >>>>>>> example of a dictionary and its provenance. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/dictionary/Overview.html#example >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Could you share your thoughts on this? >>>>>>> Our only concern right now is that it is a bit long. Would you >>>>>>> consider this a problem? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Tom >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2013/3/22 Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> my apologies, this was for a different issue. Please ignore the >>>>>>>> previous email. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2013/3/22 Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The editors agree with this comment. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The proposed resolution is to add the constraint >>>>>>>>> IF hadMember(d, e) and 'Dictionary' \in typeOf(d) THEN >>>>>>>>> hadDictionaryMember(d, e, "k") with k and unknown key >>>>>>>>> to PROV-Dictionary. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If any members of the WG have an objection to this, we ask kindly >>>>>>>>> to inform us by replying to this email. If no objections are received >>>>>>>>> before Tuesday March 26th, we will assume this resolution is accepted, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - Tom >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2013/3/7 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker < >>>>>>>>> sysbot+tracker@w3.org> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a >>>>>>>>>> dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/642 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Raised by: Tom De Nies >>>>>>>>>> On product: PROV-DICTIONARY >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Originally raised by Paul, who would like to see a small example >>>>>>>>>> of the provenance of a dictionary in the document to illustrate the spec. >>>>>>>>>> We should do this by the final release. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) >>>>>> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ >>>>>> Assistant Professor >>>>>> - Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science >>>>>> - The Network Institute >>>>>> VU University Amsterdam >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) >>>> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ >>>> Assistant Professor >>>> - Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science >>>> - The Network Institute >>>> VU University Amsterdam >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) >> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ >> Assistant Professor >> - Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science >> - The Network Institute >> VU University Amsterdam >> > >
Received on Monday, 22 April 2013 08:55:05 UTC