- From: Stephan Zednik <zednis2@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:18:29 -0600
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I have updated the PROV-XML Note Editors Draft to reflect the change to the schema. changeset: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/977239c10ed5 On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Stephan Zednik <zednis2@rpi.edu> wrote: > I think this is fine and I do not think it will cause new issues for the generated jaxb classes. The generated classes still have references to JAXBElement.class and I don't think using choice or sequence will negatively affect our FAQ entry's proposed solutions. > > I made the change and verified that the current example XML documents all validate. > > changeset: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/6e36dbad50d5 > > See editor's draft (https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/xml/schema/prov-core.xsd) for the updated schema. No changes were required for prov.xsd or any extension schemas. > > --Stephan > > On Apr 16, 2013, at 6:52 PM, "Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > >> PROV-ISSUE-664: Use choice instead of sequence in document/bundle constructor >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/664 >> >> Raised by: Stephan Zednik >> On product: >> >>> From Luc's internal feedback on PROV-XML WG Note: >> >> A while back, you rightly made the case that elements within a >> bundle/document should not be ordered. However, recently, you >> reintroduced a sequence here (probably when trying to fix the jaxb >> issue). I don't think it should stay, and it should be reverted back >> to a choice: I think the generated jaxb will still be ok. >> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 02:19:00 UTC