W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2013

PROV-DM check

From: Miles, Simon <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 11:13:36 +0000
To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AA3FA22D967B5C4E8948AADF719DA7C410910B68@AM2PRD0311MB409.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Luc, Paolo,

I've finished checking PROV-DM with the following minor errors found:

Section, paragraph above Example 12:
  "There exist no prescriptive requirement" -> "requirements"

Section 2.3, Table 3:
  "about relations linking entities referring the same thing" -> "referring to the same thing"

Section 4.1:
  Figure 2 shows activity edit1 to have "type=editing", but the PROV-N in the text says "type=edit"

Section 5.2.4, 2nd paragraph:
 "It the reason" -> "It is the reason"

Section 5.3, 1st paragraph:
 "the relations WasAttributedTo (Attribution), WasAssociatedWith (Association), ActedOnBehalfOf (Delegation)" -> missing "and" before "ActedOnBehalfOf"

Section 5.3, 1st paragraph:
 "SofwareAgent" -> "SoftwareAgent"

Section 5.3, 1st paragraph:
 "Organization" has no hyperlink to its definition, unlike "Plan", "Person" and "SoftwareAgent"

Section 5.3.5, 4th paragraph:
 "Usage" is capitalised, while no other relation is

Section 5.5.2, Example 45:
 "They are both specialization" -> "specializations"

Section 5.6.2, 1st sentence:
 "A membership relation is defined the members of a Collection to be stated." -> ?? "defined for the members"?

Appendix A, Table 10:
 The hyperlinks for "Component 4: Bundles" and "Component 5: Alternate" are switched


Dr Simon Miles
Senior Lecturer, Department of Informatics
Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK
+44 (0)20 7848 1166

Modelling the Provenance of Data in Autonomous Systems:
Received on Saturday, 13 April 2013 11:14:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:35 UTC