- From: Miles, Simon <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 11:13:36 +0000
- To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AA3FA22D967B5C4E8948AADF719DA7C410910B68@AM2PRD0311MB409.eurprd03.prod.outlook.>
Luc, Paolo, I've finished checking PROV-DM with the following minor errors found: Section 2.2.1.2, paragraph above Example 12: "There exist no prescriptive requirement" -> "requirements" Section 2.3, Table 3: "about relations linking entities referring the same thing" -> "referring to the same thing" Section 4.1: Figure 2 shows activity edit1 to have "type=editing", but the PROV-N in the text says "type=edit" Section 5.2.4, 2nd paragraph: "It the reason" -> "It is the reason" Section 5.3, 1st paragraph: "the relations WasAttributedTo (Attribution), WasAssociatedWith (Association), ActedOnBehalfOf (Delegation)" -> missing "and" before "ActedOnBehalfOf" Section 5.3, 1st paragraph: "SofwareAgent" -> "SoftwareAgent" Section 5.3, 1st paragraph: "Organization" has no hyperlink to its definition, unlike "Plan", "Person" and "SoftwareAgent" Section 5.3.5, 4th paragraph: "Usage" is capitalised, while no other relation is Section 5.5.2, Example 45: "They are both specialization" -> "specializations" Section 5.6.2, 1st sentence: "A membership relation is defined the members of a Collection to be stated." -> ?? "defined for the members"? Appendix A, Table 10: The hyperlinks for "Component 4: Bundles" and "Component 5: Alternate" are switched thanks, Simon Dr Simon Miles Senior Lecturer, Department of Informatics Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK +44 (0)20 7848 1166 Modelling the Provenance of Data in Autonomous Systems: http://eprints.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1264/
Received on Saturday, 13 April 2013 11:14:10 UTC