W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2013

Re: PROV-SEM staged, ready for review

From: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:48:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOMwk6yB=SOQo-vJFvQ=O_U=DSejHjCGBWknFgK5eHVsYFKtqw@mail.gmail.com>
To: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org Group" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
+1

Best,
Satya


On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:45 AM, James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:

>
> On Apr 11, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Khalid Belhajjame <
> Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
>
> On 11 April 2013 12:35, James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've fixed most things.
>>
>> I have a couple of questions/clarifications about the reviews.  Perhaps
>> we can discuss briefly today during the call.
>>
>>
>> - Satya and Khalid ask
>>
>> > C1. In Section 1.1., it will be helpful to provide a reference to Naive
>> Semantics.
>>  >
>>
>>
>>  > Minor issues:
>>  > Section 1.1
>>  > As Khalid pointed out, need to clarify or cite "Naive Semantics".
>>
>> I'm not sure what is being asked for - "naive" doesn't have a technical
>> meaning here.  I added references from other occurrences of "naive
>> semantics" to the first example.
>>
>
> In that case, I think it will be sufficient to state that, as one may
> think there is a class of semantics called naive.
>
>
> OK, what I have done instead is just removed the word "naive".  It was
> mostly there to flag the fact that (in earlier versions) the semantics
> lacked a completeness property.  This is no longer the case, so the warning
> no longer seems needed.
>
> --James
>
>
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2013 14:48:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:35 UTC