W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2013

Re: dc review

From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:42:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CAExK0DdPXnn7+pJWPJwLb5egfgx9sh+YPXz2bFq4_+ZiUVmk8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Cc: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Thanks for your comments.
Yes, I will. I'll send an email once these are implemented.
Best,
Daniel


2013/4/19 Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>

>
> On Apr 19, 2013, at 8:24 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <
> soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
> >> "dct:isFormatOf refers to another pre-existing resource which is the
> same
> >> but in another format" is incorrect.
> >>
> >>
> http://dublincore.org/documents/2012/06/14/dcmi-terms/?v=terms#isFormatOf
> >> says nothing about "pre-existing"
> >
> > .. although the "inverse"
> >
> http://dublincore.org/documents/2012/06/14/dcmi-terms/?v=terms#terms-hasFormat
>
> I see.
>
> > does - probably the source of confusion.
>
> Absolutely.
>
> @ Daniel, could you add a comment about that DC inconsistency in
> definitions? (that "pre-existing" is mentioned in isFormatOf but not in
> hasFormat)
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
> > School of Computer Science
> > The University of Manchester
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Friday, 19 April 2013 12:42:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:35 UTC