- From: Curt Tilmes <Curt.Tilmes@nasa.gov>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:34:12 -0400
- To: <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I strongly agree with this -- unless I hear otherwise (very soon), I will remove the schema appendix from PROV-XML. Curt On 04/11/2013 12:08 PM, Paul Groth wrote: > Hi Stephan, > > I think this is a better idea as well. This allows us to change the > schema later if bugs arise as it's hosted in /ns like the owl ontology. > > Thanks > Paul > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker > <sysbot+tracker@w3.org <mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org>> wrote: > > PROV-ISSUE-661: schema appendix of PROV-XML Note [XML Serialization] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/661 > > Raised by: Stephan Zednik > On product: XML Serialization > > from Paul's review of the PROV-XML Note: > > # Appendix > > * do we want the schemas here? we don't do this with the ontology > > Stephan: > > I believe this was added based on an informal request sometime early > during the development of the Note. I do not remember whom the > requestor was. > > I agree that it is probably unnecessary and is a pain to maintain. > I would personally prefer to replace that section with a section > that points the reader to the current published schemas. > > > > > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl <mailto:p.t.groth@vu.nl>) > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ > Assistant Professor > - Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science > - The Network Institute > VU University Amsterdam
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2013 13:34:46 UTC