W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2013

Re: Check list for the homestretch...

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:40:22 -0400
Cc: W3C Provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <B64007B9-FB22-4316-A641-B517358BEF8B@rpi.edu>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Ivan,

On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> Indeed, I did not have those files. I have pulled them from mercurial and cvs-d them. Check, please…

http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20130312 looks good. Thanks!

Tim


> 
> Ivan
> 
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 17:02 , Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Ivan,
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 20, 2013, at 5:59 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Paul, Luc,
>>> 
>>> just writing down the last check list; partially for myself. The problem is that I am at a workshop in London next week, so it will be difficult for me to do something until Friday. I want to be sure that we are still fine.
>>> 
>>> ...
>>> 
>>> - The WG has produced a number of documents in /ns, I *think* all of them are up-to-date. However, just to be sure: I attach a screen dump of the files I have on my disc, with dates; these are in sync with the content of the server. I do not remember any more what is the role of the dated owl and ttl files, and whether there is a need to update them to the final date.
>> 
>> 
>> The dated OWL files exist to be returned when one resolves the value of the owl:versionIRI found on the "latest, more abstract" ontology (or, in practical terms, "someone's copy").
>> The dated OWL files are also how we reference to previous versions using the prov:wasRevisionOf property.
>> 
>> From https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/9328abfce732/namespace/prov-o.ttl#l1244 :
>> <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o#
>>> 
>>    a owl:Ontology ;
>>    rdfs:label "W3C PROVenance Interchange Ontology (PROV-O)"@en ;
>>    rdfs:seeAlso <
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/>, <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov
>>> ;
>>    owl:versionIRI <
>> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20130430
>>> ; ######################## <- Here
>>    owl:versionInfo "Recommendation version 2013-04-30"@en ;
>>    :specializationOf <
>> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o
>>> ;
>>    :wasRevisionOf <
>> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20120312> . ######################## <- and here
>> 
>> I notice that http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20120312 404s. I wonder if you removed the dated version, or if we just did not provide one? Very likely the latter.. :-)
>> 
>> I added prov-o-20130312.ttl/owl to hg/namespace/ so that we can backfill the wasRevisionOf link above.
>> Can you push that, too?
>> 
>> Many ongoing thanks,
>> Tim
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> (Although these vocabularies are not part of /TR, I think we should really have them up-to-date at the publication)
>>> 
>>> ...
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> 
>>> Ivan
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 15:40:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:35 UTC