- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:40:22 -0400
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C Provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <B64007B9-FB22-4316-A641-B517358BEF8B@rpi.edu>
Ivan, On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > Indeed, I did not have those files. I have pulled them from mercurial and cvs-d them. Check, please… http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20130312 looks good. Thanks! Tim > > Ivan > > On Apr 29, 2013, at 17:02 , Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: > >> Ivan, >> >> >> On Apr 20, 2013, at 5:59 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> Paul, Luc, >>> >>> just writing down the last check list; partially for myself. The problem is that I am at a workshop in London next week, so it will be difficult for me to do something until Friday. I want to be sure that we are still fine. >>> >>> ... >>> >>> - The WG has produced a number of documents in /ns, I *think* all of them are up-to-date. However, just to be sure: I attach a screen dump of the files I have on my disc, with dates; these are in sync with the content of the server. I do not remember any more what is the role of the dated owl and ttl files, and whether there is a need to update them to the final date. >> >> >> The dated OWL files exist to be returned when one resolves the value of the owl:versionIRI found on the "latest, more abstract" ontology (or, in practical terms, "someone's copy"). >> The dated OWL files are also how we reference to previous versions using the prov:wasRevisionOf property. >> >> From https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/9328abfce732/namespace/prov-o.ttl#l1244 : >> <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o# >>> >> a owl:Ontology ; >> rdfs:label "W3C PROVenance Interchange Ontology (PROV-O)"@en ; >> rdfs:seeAlso < >> http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/>, <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov >>> ; >> owl:versionIRI < >> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20130430 >>> ; ######################## <- Here >> owl:versionInfo "Recommendation version 2013-04-30"@en ; >> :specializationOf < >> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o >>> ; >> :wasRevisionOf < >> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20120312> . ######################## <- and here >> >> I notice that http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20120312 404s. I wonder if you removed the dated version, or if we just did not provide one? Very likely the latter.. :-) >> >> I added prov-o-20130312.ttl/owl to hg/namespace/ so that we can backfill the wasRevisionOf link above. >> Can you push that, too? >> >> Many ongoing thanks, >> Tim >> >> >> >> >>> >>> (Although these vocabularies are not part of /TR, I think we should really have them up-to-date at the publication) >>> >>> ... >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Ivan >>> >> > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 15:40:46 UTC