- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:10:30 +0200
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Apr 29, 2013, at 08:49 , Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: > Hi Ivan, Tim > > @Ivan: Can you update the namespace with overview.html in the /namespace directory? Done. > > @Ivan: when I content negotiation for text/provenance-notation - should we get something back? > You mean in /2011/prov/provenance ? It would be nice indeed; after all, we have provenance syntax other than RDF. For a complete, and ideal picture, though, this is what we should have: - Turtle file (we have those) - RDF/XML (we can easily transform turtle files into RDF/XML with available RDF tools) - provenance-notation, if you guys give me those:-) - Prov XML, again, if you guys give me those... I am happy to do the second item as soon as the turtle files are final (they are mostly stubs at the moment), but I am not sure how to do item #3 and #4. Ivan > @Tim looking at the concatenated version you point to mercurial urls for the dm and n (e.g. http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Association) . Can we point to the correct dated urls? I think this is coming from prov-o? > > Thanks > Paul > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 07:11:11 UTC