- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:45 +0200
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Cc: W3C Provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Indeed, I did not have those files. I have pulled them from mercurial and cvs-d them. Check, please... Ivan On Apr 29, 2013, at 17:02 , Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: > Ivan, > > > On Apr 20, 2013, at 5:59 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > >> Paul, Luc, >> >> just writing down the last check list; partially for myself. The problem is that I am at a workshop in London next week, so it will be difficult for me to do something until Friday. I want to be sure that we are still fine. >> >> ... >> >> - The WG has produced a number of documents in /ns, I *think* all of them are up-to-date. However, just to be sure: I attach a screen dump of the files I have on my disc, with dates; these are in sync with the content of the server. I do not remember any more what is the role of the dated owl and ttl files, and whether there is a need to update them to the final date. > > > The dated OWL files exist to be returned when one resolves the value of the owl:versionIRI found on the "latest, more abstract" ontology (or, in practical terms, "someone's copy"). > The dated OWL files are also how we reference to previous versions using the prov:wasRevisionOf property. > > From https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/9328abfce732/namespace/prov-o.ttl#l1244 : > <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o# > > > a owl:Ontology ; > rdfs:label "W3C PROVenance Interchange Ontology (PROV-O)"@en ; > rdfs:seeAlso < > http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/>, <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov > > ; > owl:versionIRI < > http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20130430 > > ; ######################## <- Here > owl:versionInfo "Recommendation version 2013-04-30"@en ; > :specializationOf < > http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o > > ; > :wasRevisionOf < > http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20120312> . ######################## <- and here > > I notice that http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o-20120312 404s. I wonder if you removed the dated version, or if we just did not provide one? Very likely the latter.. :-) > > I added prov-o-20130312.ttl/owl to hg/namespace/ so that we can backfill the wasRevisionOf link above. > Can you push that, too? > > Many ongoing thanks, > Tim > > > > >> >> (Although these vocabularies are not part of /TR, I think we should really have them up-to-date at the publication) >> >> ... >> >> Cheers >> >> Ivan >> > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 15:21:14 UTC