- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:33:24 +0200
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJCyKRpMQ5u7n77LnnHWbCwVq0L1xiJ6rTsx8-JGQKVrrA1UMg@mail.gmail.com>
Ok... maybe it would be the grammar then that's equivalent to an xsd/ontology, right? So yeah maybe not. cheers Paul On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:27 , Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: > > > Hi Ivan, > > > > I was talking about the http://www.w3.org/ns/prov > > Hm. Then I am not sure. ns/prov is the namespace document for the OWL > ontology (which have covered) and for the XSD document. Per spec, conneg > means the same information represented in different format, and a choice > thereof; although the xsd may be a little bit of a stretch, it still fits > this picture. But a provenance notation is describing the provenance of > something, which is a different information than the ontology. So my > initial reaction is that this would not be part of a conneg. > > I may still misunderstand what you ask, though... > > Ivan > > > > > but I agree we should do the provenance as well but I think that's being > sorted out. > > > > Thanks > > Paul > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > > > On Apr 29, 2013, at 08:49 , Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: > > > > > Hi Ivan, Tim > > > > > > @Ivan: Can you update the namespace with overview.html in the > /namespace directory? > > > > Done. > > > > > > > > @Ivan: when I content negotiation for text/provenance-notation - > should we get something back? > > > > > > > You mean in /2011/prov/provenance ? > > > > It would be nice indeed; after all, we have provenance syntax other than > RDF. For a complete, and ideal picture, though, this is what we should have: > > > > - Turtle file (we have those) > > - RDF/XML (we can easily transform turtle files into RDF/XML with > available RDF tools) > > - provenance-notation, if you guys give me those:-) > > - Prov XML, again, if you guys give me those... > > > > I am happy to do the second item as soon as the turtle files are final > (they are mostly stubs at the moment), but I am not sure how to do item #3 > and #4. > > > > Ivan > > > > > > > @Tim looking at the concatenated version you point to mercurial urls > for the dm and n (e.g. > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Association) > . Can we point to the correct dated urls? I think this is coming from > prov-o? > > > > > > Thanks > > > Paul > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > > mobile: +31-641044153 > > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) > > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ > > Assistant Professor > > - Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science > > - The Network Institute > > VU University Amsterdam > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > > -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor - Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science - The Network Institute VU University Amsterdam
Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 09:33:56 UTC