W3C home
>
Mailing lists
>
Public
>
www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
>
September 2001
www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org from September 2001 by author
755 messages
:
Starting
Monday, 3 September 2001 15:38:49 GMT,
Ending
Sunday, 30 September 2001 23:57:46 GMT
sort by
: [
thread
] [ author ] [
date
] [
subject
]
Mail actions
: [
mail a new topic
]
Help
: [
How to use the archives
] [
Search in the archives
]
421621@ingta.unizar.es
Use of propietary standard. PLEASE, DONT DO!
(Sunday, 30 September)
A Seaman
Reject this proposal
(Monday, 1 October)
A. Chavan
Opposed To Patents In Web Standards
(Monday, 1 October)
Opposed To Patents In Web Standards
(Monday, 1 October)
Aaron Claessens
Comment on patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Aaron R. Kulkis
Microsoft patenting the WWW ???
(Sunday, 30 September)
Aaron Sherman
RAND Licensing Concerns
(Sunday, 30 September)
Aaron Swartz
Patent policy draft severely flawed
(Sunday, 30 September)
Adam Logghe
Strongly Opposed to W3C RAND patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
Adam Megacz
Brief words regarding RAND, capital, and non-capital economies
(Sunday, 30 September)
Adam Warner
W3C Responds
(Monday, 1 October)
Re: Please extend the comment deadline
(Sunday, 30 September)
Re: standarts should be royalty and thus patent free
(Sunday, 30 September)
Re: Web standards should be patent-free
(Sunday, 30 September)
Final Comment
(Sunday, 30 September)
Re: "Standards" with licensing restrictions disasterous to free software
(Sunday, 30 September)
W3C Patent Policy Framework Comment
(Friday, 28 September)
Adrian Harte
W3C Patent Policy Framework
(Monday, 1 October)
Alan Batie
No proprietary standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Alan Cox
W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users
(Sunday, 30 September)
Alan Johnson
Web standards should be patent free
(Sunday, 30 September)
Alastair Burt
Objections to the Working Draft
(Sunday, 30 September)
Albert A. Freeman
No patents as standards ...
(Sunday, 30 September)
Albert Weichselbraun
w3c creating its own competition
(Sunday, 30 September)
Alex Jacques
Proposed RAND Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Alexander Hristov
A question
(Sunday, 30 September)
RAND standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Alexandre Oliva
Open Standards x Patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
Alexey Medvedev
Is it time for GNU standarts organization?
(Sunday, 30 September)
Allan Martinsen
Dear Sirs/Madams
(Sunday, 30 September)
anatoly
WWW_Under_Attack
(Saturday, 29 September)
Anders S. Buch
Please keep patents out of standards!
(Monday, 1 October)
Andreas Mohr
concerns about new RAND licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Andreas Pour
RAND Will Discredit W3C
(Sunday, 30 September)
Andrew A. Meier
Please don't undo the good the W3C has achieved.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Andrew Bennetts
Comment on proposed patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Andrew M.A. Cater
Royalties and the W3C
(Sunday, 30 September)
Andrew Pam
Comment on draft W3C Patent Policy Framework
(Monday, 1 October)
Andrew Williams
Who pays?
(Monday, 1 October)
Andy Scholz
Comment
(Sunday, 30 September)
Angelia Kane
No to RAND!!!!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Anselm Hook
Objection to patent policy
(Monday, 1 October)
Antaeus Feldspar
RAND licensing is a bad idea
(Sunday, 30 September)
Anthony Hawes
RAND license
(Sunday, 30 September)
Anthony Taylor
Non-discriminatory licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Antoine Drochon
W3C Patent Policy : What a pity !
(Sunday, 30 September)
Antonio Larrosa Jiménez
RAND license and the future of the web
(Sunday, 30 September)
Archfeld Serethai
pateneted IP standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Arthur A. Gleckler
strongly opposed to W3C endorsing non-royalty-free standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Artur Skura
Patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Aschwin van der Woude
Re: Comment on proposed patent policy change
(Sunday, 30 September)
Re: [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
(Sunday, 30 September)
Asteris Masouras
Remember the browser wars? Now, apply RAND..
(Sunday, 30 September)
b
I do not agree with RAND
(Monday, 1 October)
baptiste13@altern.org
RAND licences: don\'t act unresponsibly and cowardly
(Sunday, 30 September)
Barak Pearlmutter
RAND Patents in Standards? NO!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Barry Dorrans
W3C Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Bartolomé Sintes Marco
My vote is against
(Sunday, 30 September)
beasley
patent policy
(Monday, 1 October)
Becky Kearns
RAND license *is* discriminatory...
(Monday, 1 October)
Ben Crowell
Patent owners should fend for themselves.
(Monday, 1 October)
Ben Escoto
Against patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
Ben Ford
Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users
(Sunday, 30 September)
Ben Gamari
The Patented Internet
(Sunday, 30 September)
Ben Reser
Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
Comments on RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Bernie@Hoefer.trw.com
Do Not Adopt The Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
bigzirk@mac.com
rand licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Bill Cane
Strong Objections to Proposals
(Monday, 1 October)
Bill Evans
Reflection
(Monday, 1 October)
Bill Gunn
Anti-User RAND Licensing Policy
(Monday, 1 October)
Bill Haneman
patent policy : chilling effect of RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Billw3c@sorehands.com
against reasonable licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Bob Cunnings
Impact on existing WG's
(Monday, 1 October)
Boddhisatva Troutwaxer
RAND Bad
(Monday, 1 October)
Boyd Fletcher
RAND & W3C
(Sunday, 30 September)
Bradford Business School
ISMM Professional Sales Qualifications
(Friday, 9 March)
Branden Robinson
failure to communicate
(Monday, 1 October)
I concur with Alan Cox
(Monday, 1 October)
Branen Salmon
Patents would stunt evolution of the web
(Sunday, 30 September)
Brent E. Edwards
NO to RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Brian Ashe
Allowance of RAND in standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Brian Marick
Re: Advice to lengthen the time to respond to the RAND licencing issue
(Sunday, 30 September)
Brooklyn Linux Solutions CEO
Commment on patent changes
(Monday, 1 October)
Bruce Ediger
Royalty-bound patents in web standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Bruce Endries
comment
(Sunday, 30 September)
Bruce Krysiak
Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users
(Sunday, 30 September)
Bryan McCormick
Comment on RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Burt Betchart
No Patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
Byron Como
Patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
C. Wegrzyn
Keep pay-for-play patents from the W3C
(Sunday, 30 September)
Calvin
patent free web
(Sunday, 30 September)
Cameron Kellough
Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Carey Nation
A comment on RAND...
(Sunday, 30 September)
Carl Ebrey
Sickening
(Sunday, 30 September)
Carl Spangenberger
W3C Patent Policy: W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards for the Web
(Sunday, 30 September)
carlos
please don't do it
(Sunday, 30 September)
Carsten Svaneborg
Universal freedom of expression
(Sunday, 30 September)
Carsten Ziepke
World Wide Web is International
(Sunday, 30 September)
cathybromerls@c4.com
Get sexy, Register .Sex domains! 65371
(Wednesday, 5 September)
Cay Horstmann
W3C Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
cgalpin@lighthouse-software.com
oppose RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Charles
LT: \"But we posted it\"
(Sunday, 30 September)
Charles Dillon
What part of "Free" or "open" don't you understand?
(Saturday, 29 September)
Charles Sullivan
Proposed RAND licensing model - AGAINST
(Monday, 1 October)
Chase Tingley
RAND licensing inappropriate for web technologies
(Sunday, 30 September)
Chavous P. Camp
RE: W3C Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
W3C Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Chessy
W3C: why are you fighting against your old friends?
(Sunday, 30 September)
Chip Warden
W3C: Thank you for RAND licensing policy!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Chris
Patents are dangerous to open standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Chris Carlin
Allowing Patents==bad
(Sunday, 30 September)
Chris F.A. Johnson
Patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Chris Fox
RAND is not acceptable
(Sunday, 30 September)
Chris Herron
Negative Comments
(Monday, 1 October)
Chris Leyon
Patent Policy
(Monday, 1 October)
Chris McDonough
Patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Chris Milton
Crass Stupidity
(Sunday, 30 September)
Chris Moller
non-royalty-free licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Chris Rankin
Backdoor attempt to banish Open-Source from the Web?
(Sunday, 30 September)
Chris Woodard
Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Chris Worley
MS attempt to kill Open Source projects
(Sunday, 30 September)
chrissy
royalty free standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Christer O. Andersson
RAND licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Christian Langreiter
W3C and patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
Christian Lavoie
No RAND, please!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Christian Mogensen
Vote NO on RAND Patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
Christophe Prud'homme
Bad changes in policies
(Sunday, 30 September)
Christopher Baker
Royalty-Bound Patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
Christopher Cashell
Unbelievably bad.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Christopher Felton
Stop This
(Monday, 1 October)
Christopher Hicks
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
(Sunday, 30 September)
Christopher Ramey
No. This opens the door to corruption.
(Saturday, 29 September)
Christy Ware
RAND and patents have no place on the WEB!!!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Chuck Mead
W3C Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Clark C . Evans
If it ain't broke... don't fix it.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users
(Sunday, 30 September)
cm
against new rules
(Sunday, 30 September)
co1ethompson@netscape.net
Please say NO to royalty-bound patents for the web!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Conan Callen
Re: [OT] W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards for the Web
(Sunday, 30 September)
Curtis Galloway
Allowing patents in software standards is a mistake
(Sunday, 30 September)
Cymen Vig
Consideration of Patented Standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
D Tuinstra
Patent Policy
(Monday, 1 October)
D. Hugh Redelmeier
Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users
(Sunday, 30 September)
Dale Pontius
Patent encumbrance of standards unwise in international relations
(Monday, 1 October)
Damien Miller
Patent Policy
(Monday, 1 October)
dan
Fee-bound patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Dan York
I am concerned about allowing RAND licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Daniel Boos
Patent and Standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Daniel L Speyer
RAND clause and W3C's mission
(Sunday, 30 September)
Daniel McLaury
w3c accepting patented technology as standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Daniel P. B. Smith
RAND: Sounds like a disaster in the making...
(Sunday, 30 September)
Daniel Veillard
Deeply concerned about the possible change of accepted IPR policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Daniel von Asmuth
A complete reversal of policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Danny Goodman
Turning out the light...
(Sunday, 30 September)
Darrell Parlee
RAND Concerns
(Sunday, 30 September)
Darren Schlamp
Re:%20Comment%20on%20Patent%20Policy&In-Reply-To=<20010930165427.IXMU14306.femail26.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there>&References=<20010930165427.IXMU14306.femail26.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there>
(Sunday, 30 September)
Darren.Schlamp@w3.org
Comment on Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Darron Froese
What a joke you've become W3C.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Dave Bauer
RAND is a bad idea
(Sunday, 30 September)
Dave Burstein
apologies for posting twice by accident
(Sunday, 30 September)
FYI posting inspired by IP note
(Sunday, 30 September)
Document contradicts own goals
(Sunday, 30 September)
Dave Clendenan
Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users
(Sunday, 30 September)
Dave Lacy Kusters
Patented recommendations
(Sunday, 30 September)
Dave Macmurchie
RF and RAND licencing
(Sunday, 30 September)
davem@fdgroup.co.uk
RAND et al
(Sunday, 30 September)
david
NO to new RAND proposal!
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Brownell
Just say No to RAND! (and RF)
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Casti
incorporating patented technology in W3 standards
(Monday, 1 October)
David Clifton
Patenting Standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
David D. Hagood
Re: the shift in the position of the W3C on patented standards.
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Eppstein
Patents & W3C standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
David F. Skoll
Comment on RAND policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Fries
RAND W3C
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Gould
Against a patent encumbered internet.
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Green
Proposed W3C Change on Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
David H. Silber
Patent Policy Comment
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Leppik
Re: W3C Patent Policy Framework
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Magda
patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
David McCusker
against accomodating patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Monniaux
"open standards", RAND, RF
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Northover
Proposed RAND Licensing Terms
(Monday, 1 October)
David O'Brien
RAND (www patent policy) standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Pye
Objection to RAND licencing scheme
(Sunday, 30 September)
David R. Dick
RAND policy change
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Stidolph
Proposed move to fee based standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Taté
no
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Thede
Bad bad bad idea
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Waite
It is so sad to see the W3C go
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Wentzlaff
Open Source Exclusion by Any Royalty Based Patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Wheeler
Permit _ONLY_ royalty-free working groups in the W3C!
(Monday, 1 October)
David Wragg
comments on the working draft
(Sunday, 30 September)
David Wright
No to RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Deke Clinger
RAND licensing policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Dennis Myers
W3-patentpolicy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Dennis Sosnoski
No to RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Dennis W. Tokarski
I am appalled
(Sunday, 30 September)
devnull@csp.net
RAND License Garbage
(Sunday, 30 September)
Dmitri Kulikov
No to fee-based standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Don
RAND comment
(Monday, 1 October)
Donald Ball
opposed to non-free standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Doug Blatherwick
Patents only use if completely free and unrestricted
(Sunday, 30 September)
Doug Dew
Please don't do this
(Sunday, 30 September)
Douglas Brebner
Submarine patents
(Monday, 1 October)
Douglas Goodwin
Opposition To Rand
(Sunday, 30 September)
Dr. Andrew Eric Mossberg
RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Dr. Robert G. Rittenhouse
Comments on RAND licensing.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Durval Menezes
Comment on the proposed patent policy change
(Sunday, 30 September)
E L Tonkin
RAND
(Monday, 1 October)
Eben Moglen
W3C patent policy
(Monday, 1 October)
Eberhard Milde
This is Appalling
(Sunday, 30 September)
Ed Warnicke
Patent encumbered standards squelch innovation
(Sunday, 30 September)
Ed Young
Against proposals for RAND Licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Edward Avis
Patent policy comment
(Sunday, 30 September)
Ehsan Baseri
My opinion on the RAND proposal
(Sunday, 30 September)
Eli Wallach
What are you *thinking*?!?!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Elliot Glaysher
No good can come of this. Please reject this proposal!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Enrique Baraibar
Please, reject RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Eric D. Hendrickson
Patents Will Interfere With Existing Market-Driven Processes
(Sunday, 30 September)
Eric E. Coe
Just say "no" to patents.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Eric Fletcher
RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Eric Gerlach
The Internet must remain free (gratis and libre)
(Sunday, 30 September)
Eric Hawk
opposed to RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Eric Kidd
RAND licenseing comment
(Sunday, 30 September)
Eric Laffoon
Serious issues of concern about internet patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
Eric W. Sink
Don't even think about it
(Sunday, 30 September)
Erick Staal
Advice to lengthen the time to respond to the RAND licencing issue
(Sunday, 30 September)
Do not adopt the RAND policy. It will kill the W3C
(Sunday, 30 September)
Erik Lange
Stop Software Patents!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Erik Moeller
Please keep the web OPEN
(Sunday, 30 September)
Erik Norgaard <Erik Norgaard
Fighting for the right for free information exchange
(Sunday, 30 September)
Erik Nørgaard
RAND license terms are rediculous!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Erik Sigra
Very bad news
(Sunday, 30 September)
Erik Trimble
Allowing patents in Standards is the antithesis of the W3C charter
(Monday, 1 October)
evan orensky
RAND -- "Whoops, you owe us royalties!"
(Sunday, 30 September)
Evelio Perez-Albuerne
Incorporating patented technology in W3C standards is a bad idea
(Sunday, 30 September)
Fabian Guisset
RAND not appropriate for the Web.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Farboj
NO TO PATENT STANDARDS.
(Sunday, 30 September)
fdsa
Patented software
(Sunday, 30 September)
ferdinando.gallo@tin.it
Comment to W3C Patent Policy Draft
(Sunday, 30 September)
flacco
EXCELLENT... Everything is falling into place! <HAHAHahahahaha....>
(Sunday, 30 September)
florence
the promotion of fee base standards.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Florian Weimer
Comments On The W3C Patent Policy Framework Draft
(Sunday, 30 September)
Forrest Sweasy
RAND licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Francisco Rodrigo Escobedo Robles
Patents can become an obstacle to free development/free world
(Sunday, 30 September)
Franck Coppola
Comments on the draft.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Francois-Rene Rideau
patents are evil
(Sunday, 30 September)
Frank A. Love
RAND policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Frank Earl
"RAND" licensing concerns...
(Sunday, 30 September)
Franki
response to your proposal
(Sunday, 30 September)
Fred T. Krogh
NO NO NO
(Sunday, 30 September)
Frederick R. Hanhisalo
RAND
(Monday, 1 October)
Frode Sørmo
Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users
(Sunday, 30 September)
fumetor
FREEDOM!
(Sunday, 30 September)
G. Edward Johnson
RAND will hurt the W3C and the Internet.
(Monday, 1 October)
Galen Seitz
against RAND proposal
(Sunday, 30 September)
Galle Michel
patent ? no royalty-free license ?
(Sunday, 30 September)
Gardner Neely
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
(Monday, 1 October)
I oppose RAND
(Monday, 1 October)
Gareth McCaughan
On the proposed patent policy of the W3C
(Sunday, 30 September)
Garth Highsmith
W3C Patent Policy: Bad bad bad!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Gary C
W3C Patent Policy
(Monday, 1 October)
Gary Houston
W3C Working Draft 16 August 2001
(Sunday, 30 September)
Gary Kuever
Yikes!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Gavriel State
RAND Licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
geo
new patent policy
(Monday, 1 October)
Geoff Depew
Commentary on Patent Policy
(Monday, 1 October)
George
New patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
George Toft
Opposition to Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
George Vagenas
Re RAND licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
George.Turner@command.de
Public comment
(Sunday, 30 September)
Gerald Lane
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
(Thursday, 27 September)
Gerald T. Hewes
W3C Patent Policy Framework
(Sunday, 30 September)
Gerhard Poul
W3C Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Gervase Markham
RAND: Working Group comment requested
(Monday, 1 October)
Re: Please extend the comment deadline
(Sunday, 30 September)
Even current standards are not safe!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Giorgio Galante
Wow
(Sunday, 30 September)
Glen Harman
Please do NOT incorporate RAND licensed technology in your recommendations
(Sunday, 30 September)
Glenn Alexander
RAND comment
(Sunday, 30 September)
Glenn Crocker
RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Glenn Randers-Pehrson
Re: Comments On The W3C Patent Policy Framework Draft
(Sunday, 30 September)
Opposed to RAND patents in W3C standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Glenn Reynolds
Corporate Power Grabs
(Sunday, 30 September)
Gold is Heavy
my name and other matters
(Sunday, 30 September)
RAND LICENSING IS BAD -- will do all I can to stop it
(Sunday, 30 September)
Graham TerMarsch
Disgust in proposed changes to W3C policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Grant Robinson
RAND Licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Graydon Hoare
comments on your patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Greer Pedoe
RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Greg Johnson
I oppose the W3C's proposed change in patent policy.
(Monday, 1 October)
Greg Smith
RAND Would Destroy W3C
(Sunday, 30 September)
Greg T Hill
One World, One Web, One Program......No W3C
(Sunday, 30 September)
GreyFauk
Resistance is not futile.
(Sunday, 30 September)
gricard@mac.com
W3C Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Guillermo S. Romero
About standards and limitations
(Sunday, 30 September)
Gunter Ohrner
RAND and OSS
(Sunday, 30 September)
H. Peter Anvin
Implementing RAND would be the death of W3C
(Sunday, 30 September)
H. Wade Minter
Keep the standards patent-free
(Sunday, 30 September)
Hamish MacEwan
Appalling
(Sunday, 30 September)
Hans Ridder
NO to proposed RAND patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Harold Riggs
Re: RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Harry Zink
No to RAND!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Hereward Cooper
and what about the penny-less student?
(Sunday, 30 September)
HILL, WILLIAM
patents in your standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Hilmar Berger
patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Homer Matthew Smith
Please don't do it.
(Sunday, 30 September)
hugh d fegely
RAND proprosal
(Monday, 1 October)
Iain Wilkie Logan
Protest
(Sunday, 30 September)
Ilya Volynets
RE: Dissent and comment
(Saturday, 29 September)
Re: My opinion on new policy
(Saturday, 29 September)
ilya@ns2.total-knowledge.com
My opinion on new policy
(Saturday, 29 September)
Inaky Perez Gonzalez
W3C Patent Policy: NO
(Sunday, 30 September)
Irise Lenoir
I hope you realise
(Monday, 1 October)
Ivan Fontaine
RAND is Discriminatory.
(Sunday, 30 September)
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
Don't destroy the open web!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jacob Sparre Andersen
Patents in W3C recommendations
(Sunday, 30 September)
James Arthurs
Re: RAND licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
James Briant
Patents in your standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
James Clark
All Recommendations should be royalty-free
(Monday, 1 October)
James Dornan
NO Patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
James Henstridge
Against patent policy changes
(Sunday, 30 September)
James Young
The concept of RAND is in itself discriminatory
(Monday, 1 October)
Jamie McCrindle
Do not allow "RAND" patents to pollute W3C standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Please do not encumber our standards with patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jan C. Zawadzki
Comment re. allowing patented technologies
(Monday, 1 October)
Jan D.
Don't change policy.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jay Garcia
Patented Standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jay Sulzberger
Please do not allow any W3C standard to be encumbered by patents.
(Sunday, 30 September)
jbash@velvet.com
Comment on proposed patent policy change
(Saturday, 29 September)
Jean Pierre LeJacq
Strongly disagree with proposal to allow non-royalty-free standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jean Zundel
The W3C is dead
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jean-Pierre Demailly
RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jeff Bailey
Patents in W3C technical documents
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jeff Moe
Bad Idea
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jeff Rafter
Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jeff Trefftzs
RAND: Wrong!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jeff Waller
Comment on RAND and RF type licencing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jeffrey Nelson
royalty-free standards needed
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jeffrey W. Baker
World Wide Web, RAND, and people without a lot of money
(Monday, 1 October)
Jeremy Allison
Re: RAND proposal for WWW.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jeremy Beaumont
Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jeremy James
W3C RAND proposed recommendation...
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jeremy M. Dolan
Fee-based Standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jeremy Sanders
I object to RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jeremy Scrivener
Opposed to new draft of policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jerry Asher
It doesn't make sense, it isn't fair, and it's regressive
(Monday, 1 October)
Jerry Clabaugh
W3C patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jerry Davis
RAND Licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jerry Dennany
W3C Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jesper Juhl
Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users
(Saturday, 29 September)
Please don't
(Saturday, 29 September)
Jesper Juul
Please! No royalty-based standards!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jesse Klug
Corporate product lines as "standards"
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jim Bauer
RAND uglyness
(Monday, 1 October)
Jim Flynn
RAND licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jim Wright
opposed to w3c patent-friendly policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jim Zellmer
Against W3 PATENT POLICY
(Monday, 1 October)
jk05308
Why Tim Berners-Lee is against the RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Sell out covered up by NewSpeak
(Sunday, 30 September)
JKelly
Some thoughts about standards (short)
(Monday, 1 October)
Jo Dillon
Patent policy
(Monday, 1 October)
Joanne Hunter
Please remember PNG, and do not allow RAND to become policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Joe
They laughed when I said I could make a serious profit just using the web..
(Thursday, 20 September)
Joe Baker
Nobility in Web Standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Joe Brockmeier
Patents on W3C Standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Joe Klemmer
This is not a good idea
(Sunday, 30 September)
Joe Votour
Royalty-Bound Patents in Web Standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Joerg F.Wittenberger
RAD working draft
(Sunday, 30 September)
Johan Bager
Adoption of recommendations
(Monday, 1 October)
Johan Landström
Even the idea is absurd...
(Sunday, 30 September)
john
Fee based web standard
(Sunday, 30 September)
John (EBo) David
comments on: W3C Considers Royalty-Bound Patents In Web Standards
(Monday, 1 October)
John Anderson
Concerns with implementing patented technology in W3C standard
(Sunday, 30 September)
John Beimler
This policy is wrong
(Sunday, 30 September)
John D Griffith
comment
(Sunday, 30 September)
John F. Nixon
The proposed policy is bad news
(Monday, 1 October)
John F. Sowa
Comments on proposed patent policy
(Monday, 1 October)
John Gilmore
RF > RAMMED * Deadline extension? * W3C should serve the PUBLIC interest
(Monday, 1 October)
John Hasler
W3C Patent Policy Framework Proposal
(Friday, 28 September)
John Helms
RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
John Jensen
W3C Patent Policy Framework
(Sunday, 30 September)
John Keiser
RAND Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
John Mc
W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards for the Web
(Sunday, 30 September)
John McBride
* "Standards" with licensing restrictions disasterous to free software * "Standards" with licensing restrictions disasterous to free software
(Sunday, 30 September)
John Nagle
There is no need for this.
(Sunday, 30 September)
John Panzer
Comment: Against.
(Monday, 1 October)
John Proctor
licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
John Ripley
Proposed W3C Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
John Robb
Patents should not have a place in the standards process!
(Sunday, 30 September)
John Robert Boynton
Should drop RAND, or re-open public discussion
(Sunday, 30 September)
John Tobey
No longer "world-wide"?
(Sunday, 30 September)
John William Dalton
Keep patent policy as it is (please)
(Monday, 1 October)
Jon Bendtsen
standarts should be royalty and thus patent free
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jon Forsberg
Patents in web standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jonas Jørgensen
Nooooooooooooooo!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jonas Kongslund
The RAND conflicts with the philosophy of the internet
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jonas Sicking
Please let webstandards be freely implementable by ALL
(Monday, 1 October)
Jonathan Graehl
RAND => effectively proprietary standard
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jonathan Hudson
RAND Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jonathan Mark
patent policy comment
(Monday, 1 October)
Jonathon Sim
RAND versus freedom
(Monday, 1 October)
Jonny Torvald Strom
I hope you know wath you are doing.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jose Fandos
Objections to RAND.
(Monday, 1 October)
Josef Schneider
patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Josh Sandberg
Say No to RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Josh Walgenbach
change in standards policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Joshua Prowse
This isn't necessary. I mean the W3C, that is. This patent hoopla raises legitimate issues about the viability of the W3C
(Sunday, 30 September)
Joyce Conklin
Patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
JP Glutting
Proposed Patent Pollicy Framework
(Monday, 1 October)
JP Schnapper-Casteras
RAND, Accessibility, and the Digital Divide
(Monday, 1 October)
JUAN JOSE RAMIREZ ESCRIBANO
Patents aren't standar
(Sunday, 30 September)
Judyth Mermelstein
Comment on RAND patent implementation
(Monday, 1 October)
Juergen Strobel
I will have to look for other standard bodies
(Sunday, 30 September)
julesa
The Internet: for citizens as well as commerce?
(Sunday, 30 September)
Julian Coombes
Royalty-Bound Patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
Julian Morrison
Please avoid patented standards, even "RAND"
(Sunday, 30 September)
Julian Regel
Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Justin Chapweske
Just say no!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Justin H.
RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Jørgen Ramskov
The RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Kalle Näslund
do NOT allow non royalty free patents into W3C standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Karl Heyes
patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
Karl Jackson
Please reconsider
(Sunday, 30 September)
Karl Trygve Kalleberg
The policy change with respect to patents (RAND)
(Sunday, 30 September)
Karsten M. Self
W3C "RAND" Patent Policy Framework draft
(Sunday, 30 September)
Keith Dawson
RAND is bad for the Web
(Sunday, 30 September)
Keith Willoughby
Patented standards == damage
(Sunday, 30 September)
Keith Winstein
"Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory"
(Sunday, 30 September)
Kelly `STrRedWolf` Price
This will make the W3C be spammers!!!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Kelvin Param
W3C is a pawn in an IT Cartel
(Monday, 1 October)
Ken Arromdee
New patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Ken Wronkiewicz
Please do not loosen W3C patent restrictions.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Ken Yap
No No No. Remember what W3C stands for
(Sunday, 30 September)
Kenn Munro
Opposed to Patent Policy
(Monday, 1 October)
Kenny Graunke
true standards do not allow patented material
(Sunday, 30 September)
Kent Rosenkoetter
The closing of open standards.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Kevin A. Burton
No patents for W3C technology.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Kevin B. McCarty
"RAND"
(Sunday, 30 September)
Kevin Corlette
RAND is problematic
(Sunday, 30 September)
Kevin Dangoor
Royalty-Free should be required
(Monday, 1 October)
KevinO
RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Kieran Hand
RAND Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Kiran Wagle
Royalties in patents used in standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
kiss the sun and walk on air
RAND Licensing Model -- bad.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Kisters
RAND licensing scheme
(Sunday, 30 September)
Konrad Maquestieau
I don't like the RAND license
(Sunday, 30 September)
Kristoffer Ekelund
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
(Sunday, 30 September)
Krux
W3C ridiculous new policy on patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
Krzysztof Stańkowski
non-free standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Landahl, Bill
no RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Lars Eilebrecht
Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users
(Sunday, 30 September)
Lars Forseth
RE: RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Laurent 'case' Mahieux
RAND only promotes big companies agenda
(Sunday, 30 September)
Lea Gris
What a shame. Bad shift. Ill fight against it
(Sunday, 30 September)
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
RAND License acceptance
(Sunday, 30 September)
Lee Bottemiller
Keep the web open
(Sunday, 30 September)
Leon Harris
paid royalties for standards which use patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
Levi
RAND Licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Lloyd Llewellyn
How could W3C even THINK of such a thing?
(Sunday, 30 September)
Loren Guthrie
Please do not allow RAND licenses
(Sunday, 30 September)
Luca Olivetti
RAND licensing against opennes of the world wide web
(Sunday, 30 September)
Lucas Bajrasz
Patented technologies inclusion in W3C standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Luke
I don't agree.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Luminescent
No Patents in Standards Please!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Lungo detto il Maltese
Open Source will RANDel your heads!
(Sunday, 30 September)
It's so simple: We need a new W3C
(Sunday, 30 September)
M Carling
Proposed changes to patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
M U Borchorst
RAND risks to set W3.org out of play
(Sunday, 30 September)
Maciej Stachowiak
Comments on proposed patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Marc Espie
NO to RAND patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
Marcus Lauer
Concerns regarding RAND licensing.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Margaret Leber
W3C patent policy
(Monday, 1 October)
Mario D. Santana
Dissent and comment
(Saturday, 29 September)
Mark DuPrey
Objections to RAND provision of the Patent Policy Framework
(Saturday, 29 September)
Mark Fasheh
No to RAND policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Mark Hinds
No Web Patents!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Mark Tearle
Patent Policy
(Monday, 1 October)
mark@otford.kent.btinternet.co.uk
RAND licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Martijn Dekker
Patented standard = oxymoron. A thousand times NO!!!
(Sunday, 30 September)
martin f krafft
comments against
(Sunday, 30 September)
Martin Hamilton
Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users
(Sunday, 30 September)
Martin Schlemmer
patentpolicy comment
(Sunday, 30 September)
Martin Wheeler
RAND proposal
(Sunday, 30 September)
Masatake E. Hori
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
(Monday, 1 October)
massey
NO PATENTS in STANDARDS
(Sunday, 30 September)
mate@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu
The proposal is very harmful
(Sunday, 30 September)
Mathieu Gervais
You said it better than I can
(Sunday, 30 September)
Mats Palmgren
Any fee is discriminatory
(Monday, 1 October)
Opinion on the RAND license
(Monday, 1 October)
RAND
(Monday, 1 October)
Regarding the RAND license...
(Monday, 1 October)
Matt Benjamin
Ill-Advised Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Matt Greer
new royalty based standard
(Sunday, 30 September)
Matthew Bielanski
No to RAND
(Monday, 1 October)
Matthew Boulos
Please don't allow patents into standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Matthew Easton
Patent policy - RAND may be misguided
(Sunday, 30 September)
Matthijs Sypkens Smit
No patents, please!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Maurice Rickard
Against new rules
(Sunday, 30 September)
Max Dunn
Death of the W3C
(Sunday, 30 September)
mcnill@talk21.com
Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users
(Sunday, 30 September)
Meredydd
RAND licencing
(Sunday, 30 September)
mesmith@panix.com
Patent Policy Comment
(Sunday, 30 September)
Michael C. Gilbert
noncommercial perspective
(Monday, 1 October)
Michael Greminger
RAND Hurts Everyone
(Monday, 1 October)
Michael H. Voase
If you start patenting the web,
(Sunday, 30 September)
Michael Patrick
Keep patented technologies out of W3C standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Michael Schaefer
Don't do it!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Michal Kochanowicz
Comment
(Sunday, 30 September)
Michal Politowski
W3C Patent Policy Comment
(Sunday, 30 September)
Michel Koppelaar
dangerous development
(Sunday, 30 September)
Miguel Angel López
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
(Saturday, 29 September)
Miguel Marcos
Comments
(Sunday, 30 September)
Mika Huurre
No RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Mike Baptiste
Will we choose profits at the expense of our students?
(Sunday, 30 September)
Mike Brodbelt
Proposed Changes in W3C patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Mike Coleman
against w3 patents
(Saturday, 29 September)
Mike Keehan
Proposed Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Mike Lee
Think ahead
(Sunday, 30 September)
Mike Linksvayer
"Reasonable" is a slipperly slope
(Sunday, 30 September)
Mike O'Regan
W3C Patent Policy Framework
(Sunday, 30 September)
Mike Warnecke
RAND licensing of "patented standards" will kill the web
(Monday, 1 October)
Mikko Rauhala
Does W3C yearn for the bad old days...?
(Sunday, 30 September)
Milton Henry
Loosening requirements for patented technologies
(Sunday, 30 September)
MJ Ray
Against RAND proposal
(Sunday, 30 September)
Moore, Louis
RAND Licensing is a terrible mistake
(Sunday, 30 September)
N2URO@aol.com
Comment Submission for the W3C's Patent Policy Group
(Monday, 1 October)
Nathan
RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Nathan Culwell-Kanarek
Don't include patented technology in W3C standards!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Nathan Poznick
Against patented standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Nathan Tuck
patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Nathaniel Grady
I implore you not to leave Opensource behind!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Neil Harris
Re: RAND Licensing Concerns
(Sunday, 30 September)
Neil Kandalgaonkar
RAND licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Neil Timms
Response to RAND - negative
(Sunday, 30 September)
Neil Watson
So much for an independant body
(Sunday, 30 September)
Nicolas Mailhot
Rand policies
(Sunday, 30 September)
Nicolas Ouedraogo
new RAND licensing model comments
(Sunday, 30 September)
nicolas.fugier@laposte.net
Comments about Fee-based Standards for the Web
(Sunday, 30 September)
Nicu Pavel
Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Niels Svennekjær
RAND: Friend or foe ? (or is w3c just abolishing themself)
(Sunday, 30 September)
Nile Geisinger
Leaving the W3C
(Sunday, 30 September)
Noah Hafner
comments on patented and proprietary "standards"
(Sunday, 30 September)
Noah S
W3C - Please preserve the Web!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Norman Megill
No matter what, make RAND free for Free Open Source software
(Sunday, 30 September)
nsmith@holycross.edu
Proposed patent policy destroys W3C mission
(Sunday, 30 September)
Ole Tange
Patented standards = stifling innovation
(Sunday, 30 September)
Oleg
Les brévets et les standarts
(Sunday, 30 September)
Olivier Zendra
RAND licensing: bad proposal, insufficient consultation
(Sunday, 30 September)
oscar
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
(Sunday, 30 September)
Ovidiu Gheorghioiu
Please keep the WWW free
(Monday, 1 October)
parse@earthlink.net
WTC wasn't enough?
(Sunday, 30 September)
Pat Mahoney
Against Patents in Standards
(Monday, 1 October)
Patrick Lioi
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
(Sunday, 30 September)
Patrick Logan
The idea stinks.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Patrick Wiseman
Comment on RAND policy proposal
(Sunday, 30 September)
Paul
No RAND standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Paul Chamberlain
Please, No
(Sunday, 30 September)
Paul Logston
Patent Policy
(Monday, 1 October)
Paul R. Ganci
W3C Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Paul S. & Germaine K. Mitchell
Fairness
(Sunday, 30 September)
Pawel Krawczyk
patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
pawel@jerzy.prz.rzeszow.pl
W3C Patent Policy Framework Comment
(Sunday, 30 September)
PaxDeorum Art Gallery
russian art
(Wednesday, 5 September)
pbs
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
(Sunday, 30 September)
pelegrin@labri.fr
Against RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Pete Birkinshaw
Open, shared technology, not patents
(Monday, 1 October)
Pete Black
I strongly object to the proposed policy of allowing patented technologies to be used in W3C standards definition
(Sunday, 30 September)
Pete Stewart
Please reconsider this course of action
(Sunday, 30 September)
Peter Holt Hoffman
Patents and standards are mutually exclusive
(Sunday, 30 September)
Peter Kelly
W3C patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Peter Toft
Comment on proposed patent policy change
(Sunday, 30 September)
Peter Wainwright
RAND licensing and open source software
(Sunday, 30 September)
Petter Sundlöf
Redundancy of any comment
(Sunday, 30 September)
Philip Kendall
RAND licensing model
(Sunday, 30 September)
Pierre BRUA
stop them from crashing the RAND fee plane on the free software towers
(Sunday, 30 September)
prhodes@vdsinc.com
patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
R. Douglas Barbieri
Please reconsider RAND patent policy...
(Sunday, 30 September)
Rafael Avila de Espindola
WWW death
(Sunday, 30 September)
Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
no!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Ram'on Garc'ia Fern'andez
The proposal about allowing patents on W3C standards would take away the value of these.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Ravi Nanavati
New patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
ray hartman
patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
reed mideke
Public comment system flawed, deadline should be extended
(Sunday, 30 September)
Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Refuse
NO
(Sunday, 30 September)
Reuven M. Lerner
Patents in W3C standards? Egad.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Richard A Phillips
The new W3C patent related policy seems a bad thing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Richard Ames
Please don't allow patents to monopolize SW / the web.
(Monday, 1 October)
Richard E. Brown
I say "NO!" to RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Richard Hillesley
A terrible idea
(Sunday, 30 September)
Richard Moore
Shameless attempt to commercialise the standards process
(Sunday, 30 September)
Richard Suematsu
What's wrong? These companies can't compete on their own.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Richard Thrippleton
A terrible idea
(Sunday, 30 September)
Richard Uhtenwoldt
Just say no!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Richard West
W3C Patent Policy Framework - bad move
(Monday, 1 October)
Rick McDonald
No Software Patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
Riehl, Jonathan (Jonathan)
Commercial impact of the proposed W3C patent policy.
(Sunday, 30 September)
rjh@world.std.com
Comments on proposed W3 patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
rm
comment
(Sunday, 30 September)
Rob Ewaschuk
RAND patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Rob Landley
Proprietary standards.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Rob Levin
Serious problems
(Sunday, 30 September)
Robert Gadsdon
W3C Patents -----> Monopoly Control
(Sunday, 30 September)
Robert J. Berger
No room for patents in standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Robert M. Sexton
Patent Policy and Free Internet (Rev.1)
(Sunday, 30 September)
Patent Policy and Free Internet
(Sunday, 30 September)
Robert O'Callahan
Effect on Mozilla etc
(Sunday, 30 September)
Roberto Mello
RAND is bad for everyone
(Sunday, 30 September)
Robin * Slomkowski
Do not allow patents into w3c standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Robin Mead
RAND Licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Robin Snader
Proposed RAND Policy
(Monday, 1 October)
Rod Mckenzie
Regarding the patent policy recommendation.
(Monday, 1 October)
Rodent of Unusual Size
Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users
(Sunday, 30 September)
W3C betrayal of principles
(Sunday, 30 September)
Rodney Orpheus
W3C propsed patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Rodrigo P. Gomez
What are you guys smoking?
(Sunday, 30 September)
Ron Nath
Patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Ross Werner
Patent Policy Change
(Sunday, 30 September)
Roy Barling
RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Roy Carlson
Patents and the W3C - NO !
(Sunday, 30 September)
Rufus Polson
RAND licensing and the future of W3C
(Sunday, 30 September)
Russ Magee
Proposed new RAND Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Russell Nelson
No.
(Monday, 1 October)
Ryan Myers
Comment on "reasonable and non-discriminatory" patent system
(Sunday, 30 September)
s
The Internet was developed for the Free exchange of Information - not big business
(Sunday, 30 September)
Samantha Atkins
utterly wrong
(Sunday, 30 September)
Samuel Hart
Against W3C Patent Policy (RAND)
(Sunday, 30 September)
Sara Yurman
Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
sbalneav@e-brz.com
W3C's Patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Scott Hansohn
Comments re: http://www.w3.org/2001/08/16-PP-FAQ.html
(Sunday, 30 September)
Scott Maxwell
RAND considered harmful
(Sunday, 30 September)
Scott Patten
Please say no to patented tech
(Sunday, 30 September)
Scott Prive
W3 Patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
scottr
Fee-Bound W3C Standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Sean
Why I Discourage Patented Standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Sean Borman
RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Sean Middleditch
RAND: hat about everyone else?
(Sunday, 30 September)
Seth Delackner
Please, no patented material in W3C standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Seth Johnson
Patents and the W3C
(Monday, 1 October)
[Fwd: [fairuse] My letter to the W3C: Please do not allow any W3C standard to beencumbered by patents.]
(Sunday, 30 September)
Seth Nickell
Please extend the comment period
(Sunday, 30 September)
"Standards" with licensing restrictions disasterous to free software
(Sunday, 30 September)
Shad Van Den Hul
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
(Sunday, 30 September)
shane
RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Shaun Savage
Money will do more to destroy the web the goverments.
(Saturday, 29 September)
Shawn Balestracci
RAND would stifle innovation and hurt consumer choice
(Sunday, 30 September)
Shawn Lindsay
RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Shawn Quinn
I'm horrified.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Shawn Stamps
Comment on inclusion of patented technologies in standards: JUST SAY NO!
(Sunday, 30 September)
Shawn Starr
Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Sheryl Coe
No to Patents, Yes to Discrimination
(Sunday, 30 September)
Sidney Felder
Comment on Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Simo Sorce
Please do not allow patented standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Simon Hill
W3C Patent Policy
(Monday, 1 October)
sinster@ballistictech.net
Objections to proposed patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Slater, Christopher M
I am against this policy
(Monday, 1 October)
Smitty
Proposal to allow patent-bound WWW standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
smokedjam
patented standards
(Monday, 1 October)
ss@technicalpursuit.com
RAND Licencing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Stanley A. Klein
Comment on proposed "RAND" policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Stanley Krute
royalty free standards only, please
(Sunday, 30 September)
Stefan
Let's stick together!
(Monday, 1 October)
Stefane Fermigier
Re: Comment on proposed patent policy change
(Sunday, 30 September)
Stephen Drye
RAND license is effectively impossible
(Sunday, 30 September)
Stephen Moore
Don't do RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Stephen R. Savitzky
Opposed to proposed patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
steve
w3c nonsense
(Sunday, 30 September)
Steve Ball
Royalty bound patents in web standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Steve Jorgensen
RAND policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Steve Smith
On Allowing RAND licensing to be used by W3C standards
(Monday, 1 October)
Steve Yurman
I oppose RAND
(Monday, 1 October)
Steven Barker
In opposition to RAND licenses
(Monday, 1 October)
Steven Kang
Public Comment RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Stig E Sandoe
The patent-policy change (RAND)
(Sunday, 30 September)
Stuart Ellis
Unquantifiable Liability ? An Objection to the Patent Proposal
(Sunday, 30 September)
Susan
Rand Comments
(Monday, 1 October)
Susan Lesch
Comments for WD-patent-policy-20010816
(Monday, 24 September)
Sylvester Chwastyk
Open and Free
(Sunday, 30 September)
T. Thompson
LT: NO to W3C RAND Proposal
(Sunday, 30 September)
T.D.
LT: NO to RAND Proposal
(Sunday, 30 September)
tbreuel@parc.xerox.com
patent policy comments
(Sunday, 30 September)
tech88@hanmir.com
Do you make conference calls?
(Monday, 17 September)
Terje Kvernes
RAND? please just don't.
(Sunday, 30 September)
The Nose Who Knows
Patents and royalties are the antithesis of the Web's openness
(Monday, 1 October)
The Plumblys
Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Theo de Raadt
Please extend the comment deadline
(Sunday, 30 September)
RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
Thomas Strauss
against patent-fees in w3c standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Thomas Worthington
RAND and the W3C Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Thomas Zander
patents
(Sunday, 30 September)
Thompson Hayner
simple analysis
(Sunday, 30 September)
Tim
Thanks A Lot, Folks
(Sunday, 30 September)
Tim Bray
Policy vs. mechanism
(Sunday, 30 September)
Tim Holy
RAND
(Monday, 1 October)
Tim Krieglstein
RAND policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Tim Sweeney
W3C Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Timo <Blazko> Boewing
Re: W3C Patent Policy: NO
(Sunday, 30 September)
Tobias Gloth
I believe RAND is a bad idea
(Sunday, 30 September)
Toby & Toni Meehan
RAND & intellectual property
(Sunday, 30 September)
Toby Haynes
W3C - turning it's back on the reasons that the Internet has thrived?
(Sunday, 30 September)
Todd C. Miller
Please keep web standards royalty free
(Sunday, 30 September)
Tom Bruns
RAND will kill the Web
(Sunday, 30 September)
Tom Bryan
Concerns about future fees for already implemented standards.
(Sunday, 30 September)
Tom Cooper
W3C Patent Policy: Bad for W3C, bad for business, bad for users
(Sunday, 30 September)
Tom Epperly
Reject RAND proposal
(Sunday, 30 September)
Tom Forsythe
Comments on your Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Tom Hinton
RE: Patent policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Tom McDonald
RAND policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
tom poe
Your Utter Arrogance is Showing
(Saturday, 29 September)
Tom Swiss
patented technologies in W3C standards
(Sunday, 30 September)
Tomas Pospisek
W3C appointing Microsoft, Apple, HP & Phillips to dig it's grave
(Sunday, 30 September)
Tomasz Kwiatkowski
Web standards should be patent-free
(Sunday, 30 September)
Tony O'Bryan
RAND Licensing
(Sunday, 30 September)
Tony Sellers
NO patents in standards
(Monday, 1 October)
Tony Stieber
RAND considered harmful
(Sunday, 30 September)
TopXML - Mark Wilson
This is a bad policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Total Computer Solutions
AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL!
(Sunday, 30 September)
TQ White II
I oppose RAND
(Sunday, 30 September)
tres
Patent Policy
(Sunday, 30 September)
Tuomas Lukka
Accepting for-fee-patents is a VERY bad idea
(Sunday, 30 Septe