public-rdf-wg@w3.org from April 2011 by author

Alex Hall

• Re: IRI guidance (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: IRI guidance (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: IRI guidance (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: SPARQL update with blank nodes (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: ACTION-27 (ensuring that RESOLUTION of issue-12 gets into RDF Semantics) (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: SPARQL update with blank nodes (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: SPARQL update with blank nodes (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: SPARQL update with blank nodes (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: matching basic graph patterns (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: Regrets to the F2F (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: canonical definition of RDF? (Thursday, 7 April)
• [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Thursday, 7 April)
• [Graphs] g-snap vs. g-box and graph equality (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Saturday, 2 April)
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? (Saturday, 2 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Saturday, 2 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? (Friday, 1 April)

Andy Seaborne

• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: [ALL] agenda 27 April telecon (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: [ALL] agenda 27 April telecon (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: proposal to hold a WG F2F at Bell Labs Ireland (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: Additional terminology (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. (Sunday, 24 April)
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. (Sunday, 24 April)
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. (Sunday, 24 April)
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. (Saturday, 23 April)
• [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. (Saturday, 23 April)
• Re: Graphs, some quick comments (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: Graphs, some quick comments (Thursday, 21 April)
• Additional terminology (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: matching basic graph patterns (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: 18. consequences. (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Turtle and SPARQL 1.1 last call (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: 18. consequences. (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Turtle and SPARQL 1.1 last call (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Turtle and SPARQL 1.1 last call (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: genid: (Wednesday, 20 April)
• 18. consequences. (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: genid: (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: Deprecation of X (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Saturday, 2 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Saturday, 2 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle? (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle? (Friday, 1 April)

Antoine Zimmermann

• Re: ACTION-27 (ensuring that RESOLUTION of issue-12 gets into RDF Semantics) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs] (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (Thursday, 14 April)
• Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: Deprecation of X (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: Fwd: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Wednesday, 6 April)

Axel Polleres

• Re: Regrets to the F2F (Tuesday, 12 April)

Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)

• Regrets to the F2F (Tuesday, 12 April)
• [Graph] Deprecation of reification (Wednesday, 6 April)

Dan Brickley

• Re: publication infrastructure / respec (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Thursday, 21 April)
• [JSON] schema-based mapping of json into RDF (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: genid: (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: first draft on ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) (Friday, 15 April)
• aside: "contexts" in RDF (Friday, 15 April)
• first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: Practicalities for the f2f (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: Deprecation of X (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: Deprecation of X (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: What *is* RDF? (Friday, 1 April)

David Wood

• Re: [ALL] agenda 27 April telecon (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-41 (skolem): Skolemization advice in the RDF dcocument (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: [ALL] FTF1 Minutes Update (Thursday, 21 April)
• [ALL] FTF1 Minutes Update (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Proposition to host 3rd F2F meeting at INRIA Sophia Antipolis, France 23rd-24th of April 2012 (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 20 April)
• [ALL] Document Editors (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: ACTION-28 Make sure issue-12 resolution gets to SPARQL (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Monday, 18 April)
• Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: Agenda ftf (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [Graphs] g-snap vs. g-box and graph equality (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-21 (Shared Node-IDs): Can Node-IDs be shared between parts of a quad/multigraph format? [RDF Graphs] (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle? (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle? (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? (Friday, 1 April)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Absolute IRIs (Was: Re: IRI guidance) (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: IRI guidance (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: IRI guidance (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: IRI guidance (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. (Sunday, 24 April)
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. (Saturday, 23 April)
• Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (Thursday, 14 April)
• what is ericP's Turtle homework? (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: OWL2 serialized as JSON? (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Saturday, 2 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Friday, 1 April)

Fabien Gandon

• Proposition to host 3rd F2F meeting at INRIA Sophia Antipolis, France 23rd-24th of April 2012 (Sunday, 17 April)

fensel

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Saturday, 9 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Forgot a quote in my last email :-) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Wednesday, 6 April)

Gavin Carothers

• Re: Minutes? (Friday, 1 April)

Guus Schreiber

• [ALL] agenda 27 April telecon (Tuesday, 26 April)
• [ALL] minutes last week? (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [ALL] Poll dates/location 2nd FTF (Monday, 18 April)
• [ALL] blog post about F2F (Friday, 15 April)
• [ALL] Poll dates/location 2nd FTF (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: Agenda ftf (Thursday, 7 April)
• [ALL} Agenda 6 April telecon (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Agenda ftf (Monday, 4 April)

Ivan Herman

• Re: Absolute IRIs (Was: Re: IRI guidance) (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: IRI guidance (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: IRI guidance (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: IRI guidance (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: IRI guidance (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: IRI guidance (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: [ALL] minutes last week? (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. (Sunday, 24 April)
• Re: genid: (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: 18. consequences. (Wednesday, 20 April)
• On the IDN issues (on ISSUE-8) (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: genid: (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-39: rdf: and rdfs: namespace should resolve to something that meets best practices (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list (Friday, 15 April)
• [Graphs] Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Thursday, 14 April)
• Practicalities for the f2f (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Saturday, 9 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Saturday, 9 April)
• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 (Saturday, 9 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [Graph] Deprecation of reification (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... (Wednesday, 6 April)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: Deprecation of X (Friday, 8 April)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: canonical definition of RDF? (Thursday, 7 April)

Lee Feigenbaum

• Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: [Graphs] g-snap vs. g-box and graph equality (Thursday, 7 April)
• Definition of RDF Dataset Merge added to SPARQL query draft (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Does Qurtle support empty graphs? (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion (Friday, 1 April)

Manu Sporny

• Re: [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [JSON] Tiny Proposal (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... (Thursday, 7 April)
• [JSON] A starting point... (Wednesday, 6 April)
• [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: [JSON] Tiny Proposal (Tuesday, 5 April)

Matteo Brunati

• presentation f2f about JSON (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: Practicalities for the f2f (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: [ALL] FTF presentations (Sunday, 3 April)

Michael Hausenblas

• Re: publication infrastructure / respec (Friday, 29 April)

Mischa Tuffield

• Contact with University of Southampton re: possible F2F (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Editors of various Documents (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: presentation f2f about JSON (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Fwd: some feedback about the graph concept terminology (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: Triplestores and their supported RDF import formats, and RDF output via CONSTRUCT (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: Triplestores and their supported RDF import formats, and RDF output via CONSTRUCT (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Triplestores and their supported RDF import formats, and RDF output via CONSTRUCT (Wednesday, 6 April)

Nathan

• Re: Absolute IRIs (Was: Re: IRI guidance) (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: Absolute IRIs (Was: Re: IRI guidance) (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: IRI guidance (Thursday, 28 April)
• IRI guidance (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: Additional terminology (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: Additional terminology (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: typed literal equality (Sunday, 24 April)
• typed literal equality (Sunday, 24 April)
• Re: Graphs, some quick comments (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: Graphs, some quick comments (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: Graphs, some quick comments (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Graphs, some quick comments (Thursday, 21 April)
• Graphs, some quick comments (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) (Sunday, 17 April)
• remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list (Friday, 15 April)
• REST, g-box, g-text, g-snap (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: OWL2 serialized as JSON? (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... [fixed] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Friday, 8 April)
• Deprecation of X (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals) nesting and belief (Tuesday, 5 April)
• IRI Whitespace? (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-16 (Base JSON Grammar): What is the normative serialization of the JSON grammar? [RDF JSON] (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion (Friday, 1 April)
• Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion (Friday, 1 April)

Pat Hayes

• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: [ALL] minutes last week? (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: typed literal equality (Sunday, 24 April)
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Graphs, some quick comments (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: genid: (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: first draft on ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: Deprecation of X (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Saturday, 9 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Wednesday, 6 April)

Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider

• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: Graphs, some quick comments (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: SPARQL update with blank nodes (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: SPARQL update with blank nodes (Wednesday, 20 April)
• proposal to hold a WG F2F at Bell Labs Ireland (Wednesday, 20 April)
• SPARQL update with blank nodes (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: matching basic graph patterns (Wednesday, 20 April)
• ACTION-27 (ensuring that RESOLUTION of issue-12 gets into RDF Semantics) (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: [ALL] FTF1 Minutes Update (Wednesday, 20 April)
• matching basic graph patterns (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Tuesday, 19 April)
• ISSUE-7: Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (Thursday, 14 April)
• turning JSON into RDF (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: Practicalities for the f2f (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [Graphs] g-snap vs. g-box and graph equality (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: [JSON] Tiny Proposal (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: Definition of RDF Dataset Merge added to SPARQL query draft (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? (Friday, 1 April)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: IRI guidance (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: IRI guidance (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: publication infrastructure / respec (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: IRI guidance (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Thursday, 14 April)
• owl:sameAs (Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April)) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals) nesting and belief (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [JSON] RDF collections and JSON arrays (Saturday, 2 April)

Polleres, Axel

• Belated regrets... (Wednesday, 6 April)

RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

• RDF-ISSUE-41 (skolem): Skolemization advice in the RDF dcocument (Wednesday, 27 April)
• RDF-ISSUE-40 (skolem): Skolemization advice in the RDF dcocument (Wednesday, 27 April)
• RDF-ISSUE-39: rdf: and rdfs: namespace should resolve to something that meets best practices (Saturday, 16 April)
• RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs] (Friday, 15 April)
• RDF-ISSUE-37 (fragids-in-embedded-rdf): Handling of fragment identifiers in RDF embedded in other document formats (Friday, 15 April)
• ISSUE-36: Should we change the title of rdf-schema to use the word "Schema" ? (Thursday, 14 April)
• ISSUE-35: Should there be an rdf:Graph construct, or something like that? (Thursday, 14 April)
• ISSUE-34: Do we need to add features to turtle, beyond what's in the Submission (such as inverse paths and =)? (Wednesday, 13 April)
• ISSUE-33: Do we provide a way to refer to sub-graphs and/or individual triples? (Wednesday, 13 April)
• ISSUE-32: Can we identify both g-boxes and g-snaps? (Wednesday, 13 April)
• ISSUE-31: Do we produce a standard (REC) syntax for conveying multiple graphs? (Wednesday, 13 April)
• ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Wednesday, 13 April)
• ISSUE-29: Do we support SPARQL's notion of "default graph"? (Wednesday, 13 April)
• ISSUE-28: Do we need syntactic nesting of graphs (g-texts) as in N3? (Wednesday, 13 April)
• RDF-ISSUE-27 (Deprecate rdf:value): Should we deprecate rdf:value? [Cleanup tasks] (Thursday, 7 April)
• RDF-ISSUE-26 (Deprecate rdf:ID on nodes): Should we deprecate rdf:ID on RDF/XML node elements? (use rdf:about instead) [Cleanup tasks] (Thursday, 7 April)
• RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Thursday, 7 April)
• RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] (Thursday, 7 April)
• RDF-ISSUE-23 (multigraph-media-types): Does going from single-graph to multi-graph require new format and new media types? [RDF Graphs] (Wednesday, 6 April)
• RDF-ISSUE-22 (EMPTY-GRAPHS): Does multigraph syntax need to support empty graphs? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 5 April)
• RDF-ISSUE-21 (Shared Node-IDs): Can Node-IDs be shared between parts of a quad/multigraph format? [RDF Graphs] (Friday, 1 April)

Richard Cyganiak

• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: [ALL] agenda 27 April telecon (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: Additional terminology (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: Additional terminology (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: ACTION-27 (ensuring that RESOLUTION of issue-12 gets into RDF Semantics) (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: proposal to hold a WG F2F at Bell Labs Ireland (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: 18. consequences. (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: genid: (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Turtle and SPARQL 1.1 last call (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: 18. consequences. (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document (Monday, 18 April)
• Problems with the RDF Semantics document (was: Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?) (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs] (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: first draft on ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list (Friday, 15 April)
• F2F meeting minutes (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) (Monday, 11 April)
• Fwd: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) (Monday, 11 April)
• Danbri's writeup regarding rdf:value (ISSUE-27) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Saturday, 9 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) (Friday, 8 April)
• Fwd: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: Deprecation of X (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... (Friday, 8 April)
• A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: [ALL] FTF presentations (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? (Friday, 1 April)
• Minutes? (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? (Friday, 1 April)

Sandro Hawke

• publication infrastructure / respec (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: genid: (Wednesday, 20 April)
• skolem (Wednesday, 20 April)
• rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) (Sunday, 17 April)
• first draft on ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) (Tuesday, 12 April)
• [GRAPHS] Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: Deprecation of X (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Saturday, 9 April)
• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 (Saturday, 9 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: Deprecation of X (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: Deprecation of X (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [JSON] Tiny Proposal -- rdf:Lists, property types (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [JSON] Tiny Proposal (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• [JSON] user segments, version 2 (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: Fwd: [Fwd: [Re: [RDF version of the W3C database.]]] (Wednesday, 6 April)
• "RDF Core Work Items" from the Workshop (Wednesday, 6 April)
• regrets from Nathan for today (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? (Sunday, 3 April)
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion (Friday, 1 April)
• Re: ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle? (Friday, 1 April)

Steve Harris

• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: genid: (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: genid: (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: genid: (Tuesday, 19 April)
• ACTION-28 Make sure issue-12 resolution gets to SPARQL (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Sunday, 17 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics (Saturday, 16 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Sunday, 3 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Sunday, 3 April)
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? (Saturday, 2 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Saturday, 2 April)
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion (Saturday, 2 April)
• Re: ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle? (Friday, 1 April)

Ted Thibodeau Jr

• canonical definition of RDF? (Thursday, 7 April)

Thomas Steiner

• Re: Practicalities for the f2f (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: Practicalities for the f2f (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: Practicalities for the f2f (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: Practicalities for the f2f (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: regrets from Nathan for today (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [ALL] FTF presentations (Saturday, 2 April)

William Waites

• Re: Graphs, some quick comments (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: genid: (Wednesday, 20 April)
• regrets & skolem predicates (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: ISSUE-33: Do we provide a way to refer to sub-graphs and/or individual triples? (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Saturday, 9 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Saturday, 9 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] (Saturday, 9 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: owl:sameAs (Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April)) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals) nesting and belief (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals) nesting and belief (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples (Monday, 4 April)

Last message date: Friday, 29 April 2011 19:10:49 UTC