W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 15:10:24 +0100
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, David Wood <dpw@talis.com>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E73F1454-1010-4BC8-829A-B25118AF7122@cyganiak.de>
To: fensel <dieter.fensel@ontotext.com>
On 9 Apr 2011, at 15:30, fensel wrote:
> At 21:12 08.04.2011, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>> Now you are suggesting that reification could be the way to address the multigraph stuff. I find this perverse and strongly object to the proposal. I think discussing it at all is a waste of working group resources.
> We could simply going to call it differently: basic multi-graph stuff instead of reifcation (and the charter is met twice)! 

The problem with reification is not the *name*.

Received on Sunday, 10 April 2011 14:10:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:58 UTC